What Time Did David Reach Point A After Passing Carl?

  • Thread starter Quark Itself
  • Start date
In summary: OiBDb3JlIGJhY2sgbXkgUG9saXRlLCBDYWxsIHRoZW0gQ2FydCB3YWxrdG9kIGF0IDEyIHBtIChub29uKSBhbG9uZyB0aGUgc2FtZSBwYXRoIGJ1dCBpbiBvcHRpbWl6ZSBkcmVzc2VzLiBMZXQncyBhc3NpbW5pbmcgQ2FybCByYW5zdHJhdmVzIGNvbnN0YW50IHNwZWVkIGJhY
  • #1
Quark Itself
25
0
Problem : Two hikers, Call them Carl and David started to walk at 12pm (noon) along the same path but in opposite directions. Let's assume Carl walked from Point A to point B and David did the opposite, walked from Point B to Point A. Both of them have different constant speed. They pass each other at a point at 1500 hours. Carl arrived at Point B , 2.5 hours before David arrived at point A. When did David arrive at point A?

Attempt: Carl Case 1) Xf = Xi + ViT assuming that his initial point Xi = 0 makes David's Xf = 0 as well.
Xf = 0 + 3Vi. this Xf is the meeting point, therefore they have been walking for 3 hours, hence the 3Vi.
Then I got stuck..

Thanks in advance !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Since they meet at 3:00, their elapsed times are equal, though the distance traveled are different. When the walk is over their distances are equal though the elapsed times are different.
 
  • #3
Yeah, I got that part and everything. It is very clear, but from there how do you proceed?
 
  • #4
Quark Itself said:
Yeah, I got that part and everything. It is very clear, but from there how do you proceed?

Set it up carefully and explicitly. For example, let A be at x = 0 and B be at x = L. Let Carl's speed be c and David's speed be d. Then Carl's position xc(t) is xc(t) = c*t for t <= L/c and David's position is xd(t) = L-d*t for t <= L/d. Now you have xc(3)=xd(3), and you have one other relationship regarding the endpoints. If you write things properly you will see that you do (believe it or not) have enough information to complete the question.

RGV
 
Last edited:
  • #5


Based on the given information, we can set up the following equations:

1. Carl's journey: Xf = Xi + ViT
2. David's journey: Xf = Xi - ViT

Where:
- Xf = final distance
- Xi = initial distance (in this case, 0 as both hikers started at opposite points)
- Vi = constant speed of each hiker
- T = time taken for both hikers to reach the meeting point

Since they both reach the same meeting point at the same time, we can set the two equations equal to each other:

Xi + ViT = Xi - ViT

We also know that Carl arrived at Point B 2.5 hours before David arrived at Point A, which means that T = 2.5 hours for David's journey.

Substituting this value into the equation, we get:

Xi + Vi(2.5) = Xi - Vi(2.5)

2Xi = 5Vi

Solving for Xi, we get: Xi = 2.5Vi

This means that David's initial distance is 2.5 times Carl's initial distance. Since they are walking in opposite directions, David's final distance (Point A) will also be 2.5 times Carl's final distance (Point B).

We also know that they both reached the meeting point after 3 hours of walking, so we can set up another equation:

Carl's journey: Xf = 3Vi
David's journey: Xf = 2.5(3Vi) = 7.5Vi

Since they both reach the same meeting point, we can set these two equations equal to each other:

3Vi = 7.5Vi

Solving for Vi, we get: Vi = 0.4

This means that Carl's constant speed is 0.4 units per hour and David's constant speed is also 0.4 units per hour.

Now, to find out when David arrived at Point A, we can use the equation Xf = Xi - ViT and substitute the values we have calculated:

Xf = 2.5(0.4) - 0.4(T)
0 = 1 - 0.4T
0.4T = 1
T = 2.5 hours

Therefore, David arrived at Point A at 1500 hours + 2.5 hours =
 

FAQ: What Time Did David Reach Point A After Passing Carl?

What is the purpose of walking back and forth in a scientific experiment?

Walking back and forth is often used in experiments to create a controlled environment and reduce any potential bias. It allows for repeated measurements to be taken and ensures consistency in data collection.

How does walking back and forth affect the results of an experiment?

Walking back and forth helps to eliminate any potential confounding variables and ensures that the results are more accurate and reliable. By repeating the experiment multiple times, any outliers or errors can be identified and removed from the data.

Is walking back and forth necessary for all types of experiments?

Walking back and forth may not be necessary for all types of experiments, but it is a common practice in many scientific studies. It is particularly useful in experiments that involve collecting data from human subjects, as it helps to reduce the impact of individual differences.

How do you determine the number of times to walk back and forth in an experiment?

The number of times to walk back and forth in an experiment will vary depending on the specific study and research question. It is typically determined based on statistical power calculations, which take into account factors such as sample size, effect size, and desired level of confidence in the results.

Is walking back and forth considered a reliable method in scientific research?

Yes, walking back and forth is generally considered a reliable method in scientific research. It helps to minimize potential errors and increase the validity and replicability of the results. However, it is important to also consider other factors such as sample size, control groups, and appropriate statistical analyses to ensure the reliability of the findings.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
5K
2
Replies
48
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top