Why do we smile when looking at babies?

  • Medical
  • Thread starter Mk
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the phenomenon of smiling upon seeing babies and the reasons behind it. It is suggested that this may be due to empathy, the innocence and potential of babies, and the hormone oxytocin, which plays a role in social bonding. Some participants express a lack of interest in babies, while others mention their love for children and animals.
  • #36
Math Is Hard said:
I've definitely softened up on my opinions since I became an Auntie five months ago. I now know at least one baby who isn't boring or stupid. It's very surprising because usually I have no idea how to interact with babies, but this one is very engaging and doesn't require any cooing or babbling from me. She even seems to like being held by me and reaches for me when she sees me. Most babies begin to scream and squirm about 2 seconds after their parents put them in my arms. I have to conclude that this is an exceptional child. The fact that I'm her Auntie has no bearing on this of course. :biggrin:
I had the same experience when my nephew was born. He wasn't so good for everyone, which leaves me wondering if they can somehow distinguish the closer relatives from non-relatives or more distant relatives. Maybe there are things just enough alike about my sister and I that my nephew somehow knew I was "close enough," at least until he was ready to be fed. :biggrin:

I'm not at all into the "cooing and babbling" with babies, and think its counter-productive (and just plain annoying). How are they going to start developing language skills if you babble to them or talk in "cutesy, wootsy wittle words?" If anything, I'm more careful of my words around babies and children, pronouncing things carefully and encouraging toddlers to "use your words" when asking for something.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #37
Rather than "cooing and babbling", I like to make faces at babies.
That gets their attention, and usually, they start giggling at my antics.
I think that is a fun sort of "conversation" with them.
 
  • #38
arildno said:
Rather than "cooing and babbling", I like to make faces at babies.
That gets their attention, and usually, they start giggling at my antics.
I think that is a fun sort of "conversation" with them.

With my new grandaughter (born last Winter Solstice) I did faces with my fingers wiggling in my ears or thumbing my nose. And I found she was fascinated with that finger play. I tried it agan recently, now that she was six months old, and she was still delighted by it. Suggestion for men who can't bring themselves to coo.
 
  • #39
selfAdjoint said:
With my new grandaughter (born last Winter Solstice) I did faces with my fingers wiggling in my ears or thumbing my nose. And I found she was fascinated with that finger play. I tried it agan recently, now that she was six months old, and she was still delighted by it. Suggestion for men who can't bring themselves to coo.
Besides, it is very fun to act in such an un-adultish manner:biggrin:

Congratulations with your (relatively) new family member!
 
  • #40
I try not to do anything in order to draw child's attention to myself! I think they're fine as long as you just watch them from distance and not to close to them...:rolleyes:
 
  • #41
Sometimes, babies are cute ; however, most of the time, not so. Nevertheless, I learned socially to smile at babies, and to say things like "oh, how cute", because I have the impression you're somehow expected to do so, and it is bad manners not to. So it became an automatism, like putting your hand out when meeting someone.
 
  • #42
selfAdjoint said:
she was fascinated with that finger play. I tried it again recently... and she was still delighted by it. Suggestion for men who can't
:devil: :biggrin: This would be an absolutely completely inappropriate time to make a comment. o:) :wink: :blushing:
 
  • #43
Babies make me laugh.

I don't know, people ask, "why are you laughing?" and I have no explanation. They just do silly things. They can have a seriously goofy-looking facial expression and it won't bother them. That's funny! And they're always doing something they haven't experienced or don't know about, finding something interesting that's so trivial and banal normally. It makes you look at it in a new way, and you catch yourself, and just have to laugh it off. My nephews appear to have so much fun with stupid stuff.

Maybe I would not find it so funny if I had to live with them. Then, maybe I would find it too funny. ;)
 
  • #44
Just rereading some of the posts on this thread it seems that some people have a serious problem with babies as "other"; a threat, a joke, quaint, stereotyped because they have no internal representation of the babies as real human beings.

Babies are people; they have varied personalities and reactions. Yes they all have their physical needs, which they can't service for themselves and therefore demand service from those around them. None of those needs are anything we ourselves don't need every day! Cut 'em some slack! Try to see what is unique about this baby and different from that baby; it's not hard, it just takes an atitude adjustment.

Why should you bother? Because we are all in this human mess together and it behooves us to "hang together lest we all hang separately".
 
  • #45
Great post, SA!
I would like to add that the modes of communication between ourselves and a baby are, however, different than those between adults.
If I manage to get eye contact, attention, and some reaction to what I am doing, then this, IMO, is a form of communication with the baby as an individual, in particular if I let the baby have the option to do something active in return.
(For example holding out a finger in case he or she wants to grab it).
 
  • #46
arildno said:
Great post, SA!
I would like to add that the modes of communication between ourselves and a baby are, however, different than those between adults.
If I manage to get eye contact, attention, and some reaction to what I am doing, then this, IMO, is a form of communication with the baby as an individual, in particular if I let the baby have the option to do something active in return.
(For example holding out a finger in case he or she wants to grab it).

Thanks for the complement :blushing:

Your points are very good, and worth pondering. I want to add one point. Although babies don't give the signs we are used to interpret as conscious awareness, they do have memory, apparently almost from birth. If you have taken the trouble to find a successful communications mode with a baby, the baby will remember that. No kidding!
 
  • #47
Oh, don't worry, it's an affectionate laugh.

I'm laughing WITH them. :)

(Actually, SA, if you ask me, I think more people have a problem with viewing teenagers and other young people as "other" and fail to consider that they too are human beings with the same basic rights and freedoms... such as, oh, maybe the right to consent to their educational experience? ...what a radical thought that is for some).
 
Last edited:
  • #48
Mk said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Baby.jpg
This picture illustrates the irresistible human urge for people to smile when they see an infant of their own kind. It took me about ten tries, seriously, to not smile. Its so hard. I also thinks its works better with females, or maybe they just down hold it back as much.

I didn't smile first time. I guess I'm callous =p
 
  • #49
That's not fair, when the baby is already smiling! :P

Maybe we smile because we want to them to smile, is all.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
6K
Writing: Input Wanted Sanity check: Alien reproduction
Replies
12
Views
853
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
31
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
324K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top