Why Does Changing the Order of Integration Affect the Integral Result?

  • Thread starter engin
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mistake
So where is the mistake?In summary, the double integral on D of sin[((x^3)/3) - x] dxdy where D={(x,y): 1<=y<=4 , sqrt(y)<=x<=2 } can be simplified to an integral from u=-2/3 to u=2/3 of sin(u)du, which equals 0. However, the given answer may be incorrect.
  • #1
engin
8
0
(Double integral on D) sin[((x^3)/3) - x] dxdy = ? where
D={(x,y): 1<=y<=4 , sqrt(y)<=x<=2 }.

Okay, we change the order of integration and then we get

(Double integral on D') sin [((x^3)/3) - x] dxdy where
D'={(x,y): 1<=x<=2 , 1<=y<=(x^2). Thus, we get the one variable integral

(Integral from x=1 to x=2) (x^2 - 1)* sin[((x^3)/3) - x]dx.

Letting u = ((x^3)/3) converts the integral to

(Integral from u=-2/3 to u=2/3) sin(u)du = 0. So where is the mistake?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Isn't this correct?
 
  • #3
Shouldn't the substitution be u = x^3/3 - x? Which would make the bounds in u space be -2/3 to 5/3?

Edit: Nevermind, -2/3 to 2/3 is the correct bounds.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Pardon, the substitution is of course u = x^3/3 - x but i have found the integral 0. The answer in the worksheet is different though.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Woops... I see no problem with your work, and it looks like the integral should indeed be 0.
 

FAQ: Why Does Changing the Order of Integration Affect the Integral Result?

What is the scientific approach to finding mistakes?

The scientific approach to finding mistakes involves following a systematic and logical process to identify and correct errors. This typically includes identifying the problem, formulating a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experimentation, and analyzing the results to determine the source of the mistake.

How do you determine if there is a mistake?

To determine if there is a mistake, a scientist will carefully review the data, methods, and results of their experiment. They may also consult with colleagues or conduct further experiments to confirm their findings. Additionally, they may use statistical analysis or other tools to identify any patterns or anomalies that could indicate a mistake.

Can mistakes be beneficial in the scientific process?

While mistakes are often seen as negative, they can actually be beneficial in the scientific process. Mistakes can lead to new discoveries, as well as help scientists refine their methods and improve their experiments. They also encourage critical thinking and the development of new ideas.

How can you prevent mistakes in scientific research?

To prevent mistakes in scientific research, scientists follow strict protocols and procedures. This includes carefully designing experiments, using precise and accurate measurement tools, and carefully documenting all steps and results. Additionally, peer review and replication of experiments can help catch and prevent mistakes.

What are common types of mistakes in scientific research?

Common types of mistakes in scientific research include human error, equipment malfunction, faulty assumptions, and data manipulation. Additionally, mistakes can also occur due to lack of knowledge or understanding, bias, or inadequate sample sizes. It is important for scientists to be aware of these potential mistakes and take steps to prevent them.

Similar threads

Back
Top