- #1
ChrisVer
Gold Member
- 3,378
- 465
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0410370v2.pdf
Can someone help me understand why in the Sec. 3 Custodial Symmetry, Eq 45-51 he goes all the way in defining a bivector Higgs field in the way he did?
Can someone help me understand why in the Sec. 3 Custodial Symmetry, Eq 45-51 he goes all the way in defining a bivector Higgs field in the way he did?