Why Does the Matrix Transformation Not Equal dxdydz?

In summary: You meant the following.\begin{bmatrix} \frac{dx}{dr}&\frac{dx}{d\theta}& \frac{dx}{d\phi}\\ \frac{dy}{dr}&\frac{dy}{d\theta}& \frac{dy}{d\phi}\\ \frac{dz}{dr}&\frac{dz}{d\theta}& \frac{dz}{d\phi}\end{bmatrix} If you're asking about the dot product of vectors, you need to explain how the thing on the left
  • #1
Iraser
1
0
Hey everyone, could anyone help me with this proof?
| dx/dr dx/d0 dx/d@ |
| dy/dr dy/d0 dy/d@ | dot [drd0d@] = dxdydz
| dz/dr dz/d0 dz/d@ |

d0 is d[theta] and d@is d[phi]

i cannot get this to equal, after solving it many ways i always get 3dxdydz - 3dxdydz??

Any help would be appreciated

[EDIT]

Well i have attempted this multiple times, and verified this with Wolfram Alpha as well. This can not be proved to equal dxdydz
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are asking about the product of a matrix times a vector?

[tex] \begin{bmatrix}
\frac{dx}{dr}&\frac{dx}{d\theta}& \frac{dx}{d\phi}
\\ \frac{dy}{dr}&\frac{dy}{d\theta}& \frac{dy}{d\phi}
\\ \frac{dz}{dr}&\frac{dz}{d\theta}& \frac{dz}{d\phi}
\end{bmatrix}
\begin {bmatrix}
dx\\dy\\dz
\end {bmatrix} [/tex]

If you're asking something about the dot product of vectors, you need to explain how the thing on the left side of the expression is a vector.

My guess is that you're trying to prove something involving calculus by applying simple algebra to the differential expressions. That might not work. For example, if

[tex] x = f(r,\theta,\phi) [/tex] some books might write

[tex] dx = (\partial x/ \partial r) dr + (\partial x/ \partial \theta) d\theta + (\partial x/ \partial \phi) d\phi [/tex] to indicate how to approximate a small change in [tex] x [/tex].

I suppose some books might use [tex] dx/dr [/tex] instead of [tex] \partial x/ \partial r [/tex] Will some kind person please explain this distinction?
 
  • #3
You didn't explain what your symbols represent exactly.
So I'm going to make an educated guess.
Did you mean the following?

[tex]
\begin{bmatrix}
\frac{dx}{dr}&\frac{dx}{d\theta}& \frac{dx}{d\phi}
\\ \frac{dy}{dr}&\frac{dy}{d\theta}& \frac{dy}{d\phi}
\\ \frac{dz}{dr}&\frac{dz}{d\theta}& \frac{dz}{d\phi}
\end{bmatrix}
\begin {bmatrix}
dr\\d\theta\\d\phi
\end {bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
\frac{dx}{dr}dr + \frac{dx}{d\theta}d\theta + \frac{dx}{d\phi}d\phi
\\ \frac{dy}{dr}dr + \frac{dy}{d\theta}d\theta + \frac{dy}{d\phi}d\phi
\\ \frac{dz}{dr}dr + \frac{dz}{d\theta}\theta + \frac{dz}{d\phi}d\phi
\end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
dx
\\ dy
\\ dz
\end{bmatrix}
[/tex]
 

FAQ: Why Does the Matrix Transformation Not Equal dxdydz?

What is a matrix?

A matrix is a rectangular array of numbers or symbols arranged in rows and columns. It is used to represent linear equations and transformations in linear algebra.

How do I prove a matrix?

To prove a matrix, you need to show that it follows the properties of matrices, such as closure, commutativity, and associativity. You also need to provide evidence for any transformations or operations performed on the matrix.

What is the purpose of proving a matrix?

The purpose of proving a matrix is to ensure the accuracy and validity of any calculations or transformations performed on the matrix. It also allows for a better understanding of the properties and behavior of matrices.

What are some common methods for proving a matrix?

Some common methods for proving a matrix include using mathematical properties and theorems, performing matrix operations, and providing numerical examples or counterexamples.

Are there any tips for successfully proving a matrix?

Some tips for successfully proving a matrix include organizing your work in a clear and logical manner, double-checking your calculations and transformations, and using multiple methods to confirm your proof.

Similar threads

Back
Top