Why is Schwarzschild singularity not real

In summary, the Schwarzschild singularity at the event horizon appears to be a coordinate singularity, as it goes away when using different coordinates. This is analogous to the singularity at the north and south poles when using latitude and longitude as coordinates. The singularity at the event horizon is not real, as it only appears when using Schwarzschild coordinates which do not make sense there. The space-time interval (or distance) calculated using the Schwarzschild coordinates is infinite at the event horizon because those coordinates do not cover events on the horizon itself. However, the space-time interval is finite and invariant when calculated using other coordinates or when taking the limit as one endpoint approaches the horizon in the Schwarzschild coordinates. Therefore
  • #1
Blackholeinside
6
0
It seems to me that the Schwarzschild singularity is generated by the metric function which is an invariant and so has the same value in any coordinate system, so why is it not equally valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Blackholeinside said:
It seems to me that the Schwarzschild singularity is generated by the metric function which is an invariant and so has the same value in any coordinate system, so why is it not equally valid?

There are two singularities here, and it's not clear which one you're talking about it.

The one at ##r=0## is real.
The one at the event horizon where ##r=R_S## is not real, or more accurately it's a "coordinate singuarity" - it appears only if you use Schwarzschild coordinates, and then only because those coordinates are defined in such a way that they don't make sense there. It's analogous to the singularity we find at the north and south poles when we use latitude and longitude as our coordinates - there's nothing wrong with the metric at the poles, there's no strange physics going on there, you can walk around on the curved surface just as you would anywhere else... But you don't have a longitude there.

We know that the singularity at the event horizon is a coordinate singularity because it goes away if you just use a different coordinate system (Kruskal, for example).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #3
I have read that before but my question is how do I square it with D (the metric 'distance') being an invariant? You cannot get rid of it if it is invariant.
 
  • #4
Blackholeinside said:
I have read that before but my question is how do I square it with D (the metric 'distance') being an invariant? You cannot get rid of it if it is invariant.
By "metric distance" you mean the space-time interval calculated from the metric tensor? If so, I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I understand your question. That distance is indeed an invariant, and with appropriate choice of coordinate system we can calculate its invariant value at the event horizon and anywhere except at the central singularity.
 
  • #5
"That distance is indeed an invariant, and with appropriate choice of coordinate system we can calculate its invariant value at the event horizon and anywhere except at the central singularity" - precisely. I calculate the distance in Schwarzschild coordinates and it comes to infinity and hence this is true in any coordinate system as you rightly point out.
 
  • #6
Blackholeinside said:
"That distance is indeed an invariant, and with appropriate choice of coordinate system we can calculate its invariant value at the event horizon and anywhere except at the central singularity" - precisely. I calculate the distance in Schwarzschild coordinates and it comes to infinity and hence this is true in any coordinate system as you rightly point out.

Which distance did you calculate? Between which two point/events?
 
  • #7
Tthe space-time interval - I don't know the best term for this.
 
  • #8
Blackholeinside said:
Tthe space-time interval - I don't know the best term for this.

Yes, but between which two events?
 
  • #9
Since it is infinite it will be infinite between any point outside the black hole and a radial point on the event horizon.
 
  • #10
Blackholeinside said:
Since it is infinite it will be infinite between any point outside the black hole and a radial point on the event horizon.

Schwarzschild coordinates do not apply for events on the horizon.
 
  • #11
Blackholeinside said:
Since it is infinite it will be infinite between any point outside the black hole and a radial point on the event horizon.

Try it for a point near but not exactly on the horizon, compare with the interval as calculated using some other coordinates - you'll find the interval is finite and invariant.

The infinity you're finding with Schwarzschild coordinates is happening because those coordinates don't cover events on the horizon itself, so you can't use them if one endpoint is on the horizon. Although it's not obvious from the way the Schwarzschild metric is usually written, Schwarzschild coordinates cover two non-overlapping patches of spacetime, once outside the horizon and the other inside.
 
  • #12
Blackholeinside said:
Since it is infinite it will be infinite between any point outside the black hole and a radial point on the event horizon.

Please show your work. Or no, I have a better idea; I'll show you the correct calculation.

As Nugatory says, Schwarzschild exterior coordinates don't actually cover the horizon, so the best way to really make this calculation easy is to use other coordinates that do, such as Painleve coordinates. But I'll use a different approach, which is to compute the radial distance between two points, one of which is very close to the horizon, in Schwarzschild coordinates, and then take the limit as the radial coordinate of the lower point goes to the radial coordinate of the horizon.

Since the only coordinate that will vary is ##r## (a purely radial line in a surface of constant coordinate time), the line element is

$$
ds^2 = \frac{1}{1 - 2M / r} dr^2
$$

So the radial distance is the integral of ##ds = \sqrt{ds^2}##, or

$$
s = \int ds = \int_{\rho}^{R} \sqrt{\frac{r}{r - 2M}} dr
$$

where ##r = \rho## is the inner point (the one whose radial coordinate we'll let go to ##2M##) and ##r = R## is the outer point, the one we'll hold constant. Looking up the antiderivative in a table of integrals (for example, see here), we obtain

$$
s = \left[ \sqrt{r \left( r - 2M \right)} + 2M \ln | \sqrt{r} + \sqrt{r - 2M} | \right]_{\rho}^{R}
$$

This is easily evaluated (I have rearranged the log terms to make things look a bit neater, and removed the absolute value signs since everything inside them is nonnegative):

$$
s = \sqrt{R \left( R - 2M \right)} - \sqrt{\rho \left( \rho - 2M \right)} + 2M \ln \frac{\sqrt{R} + \sqrt{R - 2M}}{\sqrt{\rho} + \sqrt{\rho - 2M}}
$$

We can now take the limit as ##\rho \rightarrow 2M##, and we get an obviously finite answer:

$$
s = \sqrt{R \left( R - 2M \right)} + 2M \ln \left( \sqrt{\frac{R}{2M}} + \sqrt{\frac{R}{2M} - 1} \right)
$$

Note, also, that as ##R \rightarrow 2M##, ##s## goes to zero, as it should.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Matterwave, vanhees71 and SlowThinker
  • #13
Blackholeinside said:
I calculate the distance in Schwarzschild coordinates and it comes to infinity and hence this is true in any coordinate system as you rightly point out.
Then you calculated it wrong. All spacetime intervals are finite at the horizon.
 
  • #14
Thanks so much for the helpful guidance. It has given me a great deal to think about. Particularly Peter Donis who went to so much trouble to show me I was wrong! This is not a mistake that I will make again.
 

FAQ: Why is Schwarzschild singularity not real

Why is the Schwarzschild singularity not real?

The Schwarzschild singularity is a hypothetical point at the center of a black hole where the gravitational pull becomes infinite. However, this concept is based on classical physics and does not take into account the principles of quantum mechanics. According to the theory of relativity, the singularity is not a real physical entity, but rather a mathematical artifact that arises from the simplifications made in the equations. Therefore, it is not considered to be a physically real phenomenon.

Can we observe the Schwarzschild singularity?

No, we cannot observe the Schwarzschild singularity directly. Since it is not a physically real entity, it cannot be detected or observed by any means. The event horizon of a black hole, which is the point of no return for anything that falls into it, is the closest we can get to the singularity. However, even the event horizon is beyond our current technological capabilities to observe.

If the Schwarzschild singularity is not real, what is at the center of a black hole?

The exact nature of what lies at the center of a black hole is still unknown and remains a subject of ongoing research and debate. Some theories suggest that it could be a point of infinite density and curvature known as a "gravitational singularity," while others propose that it could be a region of highly compressed matter called a "quantum foam." However, until further advancements in physics and technology are made, the true nature of the center of a black hole remains a mystery.

How does the concept of the Schwarzschild singularity impact our understanding of black holes?

The concept of the Schwarzschild singularity is an important aspect of understanding the behavior of black holes. While it may not be a physically real entity, it helps us to make predictions and calculations about the properties of black holes, such as their mass, size, and gravitational pull. It also plays a crucial role in the development of theories and models that attempt to explain the behavior of black holes.

Is there any evidence to support the existence of the Schwarzschild singularity?

There is currently no direct evidence to support the existence of the Schwarzschild singularity. However, the predictions made using the concept of the singularity have been observed and confirmed through various experiments and observations. This lends support to the idea that the singularity, while not a physically real entity, is a useful mathematical tool for understanding the behavior of black holes.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
57
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top