Why reducing nature of hydrides increases down a group?

In summary, we say that non metallic oxides are acidic, but metallic oxides are basic. This is due to the different ways that reducing nature decreases down a group.Going down the group, wouldn't the bond between the atom and oxygen get weaker, so the atom would furnish Oxygen easily which would actually increase oxidizing power.But then again, contradicting the above statement, going down the group decreases the number of O atoms(inert pair e.) on the Non metal, which would again decrease the oxidizing power of the oxide.And also i remember reading somewhere(NCERT) that larger the atom, more ability to stabilize the oxide ions(read it under s-block).That would mean it would decrease the
  • #36
AdityaDev said:
I have never read about basic nature of hydrides. They are known to be reducing agents. Alkali metal hydrides react with water liberating hydrogen gas and a hydroxide. Also such hudrides are called salt-like hydrides not acidic or basic hydrides. But non metal hydrides are basic like NH3.
But when comparing acidity of NH3,PH3,AsH3,SbH3 we say that Down the group acidity increases which is analogue to up the group basicity increases?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #37
That is because of low electron density at central atom. As size increases, the electron density around central metal atom decreases hence basicity decreases.
 
  • #38
AdityaDev said:
That is because of low electron density at central atom. As size increases, the electron density around central metal atom decreases hence basicity decreases.
So why that statement is wrong in case of oxides of that group?
 
  • #39
Jack2 said:
I would strongly advise you to read this up . It will give you an idea for your halogen statement .
In continuation with post #25 why then group 16? Wiki is showing that they are not hydrides but like hydrogen selenide, hydrogen oxide etc.
 
  • #40
Raghav Gupta said:
In continuation with post #25 why then group 16? Wiki is showing that they are not hydrides but like hydrogen selenide, hydrogen oxide etc.
Hydride mean a hydrogen atom with a negative charge .
In all halogens , hydrogen has +1 charge . They are called acids , not hydrides .
In group 16 , the lower elements are metallic ( having EN less than 2.1 ) so their compounds can be called hydrides . So I made a generalized statement .
But surely halogen groups don't form hydrides .
 
  • #41
Why the generalized statement , when only in that group Polonium is a metal? It should be called a exception from 16 group.
and what about this?
Raghav Gupta said:
I was reading that but there the wikipedian has written citation needed where he/she is saying following compounds are hydrogen and not hydrides, means he/she can be lying. :biggrin:

Basically what I meant in this thread is hydrogen bonding to elements whether it would be a hydride or hydrogen that's all nomenclature but a hydrogen is hydrogen.
Now one can also argue with oxides, there are peroxides, superoxides. But what really matter is linkage of element with oxygen.
 
  • #42
To all - please keep your posts on topic and if you have new questions, start a new thread.
 
  • #43
Borek said:
To all - please keep your posts on topic and if you have new questions, start a new thread.

I few days ago started a new thread but got only one reply and none then.
Even if you have said I don't know it would have been fine( I know elders hesitate to say this sometimes but then also basic etiquettes are required).

Anyway I agree with you that for new questions new thread must be started and by the way excluding 2 threads you have helped me a lot in chemistry.
But any comment or reply for first para?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
21K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top