- #1
monade
- 2
- 0
When the source is moving with respect to the observer, the emitted wave undergoes this well-known frequency shift (Doppler shift). But isn't there also a power shift?
Let a source emit a signal (sound or light) with constant power, say P_0, and moves towards the observer with constant speed. So, the distance between source and obs decreases. Now, the emitted wave travels with a finite speed. So, the traveling duration of the signal decreases with time. So at the observer the energy arrives with an increased rate. So, similar to the frequency, the received power P_r is increased: P_r = P_0 + dP.
It is here of course assumed that there is no free-space (geometrical) loss. That is, the emitted power is entirely received by the observer, no matter what the separation distance is.
If there is indeed a power shift, why is this effect so rarely mentioned? Could it be because the power shift is generally negligible compared to the power changes caused by separation-distance changes (just like a point source gets brighter as it gets nearer)?
Thanks for your comments.
Let a source emit a signal (sound or light) with constant power, say P_0, and moves towards the observer with constant speed. So, the distance between source and obs decreases. Now, the emitted wave travels with a finite speed. So, the traveling duration of the signal decreases with time. So at the observer the energy arrives with an increased rate. So, similar to the frequency, the received power P_r is increased: P_r = P_0 + dP.
It is here of course assumed that there is no free-space (geometrical) loss. That is, the emitted power is entirely received by the observer, no matter what the separation distance is.
If there is indeed a power shift, why is this effect so rarely mentioned? Could it be because the power shift is generally negligible compared to the power changes caused by separation-distance changes (just like a point source gets brighter as it gets nearer)?
Thanks for your comments.