Would Room Temperature Superconductors Violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

This is in line with the basic principle of the Second Law that no system can have an efficiency of 100%. In summary, the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the efficiency of any system is always less than 1. Even if a superconducting material at room temperature were to have zero resistance, there would still be losses associated with the system, meaning that the efficiency would still be less than one. This is in line with the basic principle of the Second Law that no system can have an efficiency of 100%.
  • #1
aim1732
430
2
I have this physical chemistry this semester with a very small section on thermodynamics--namely the Second Law and its applications to feasibility of reactions.Because our class is not very familiar with the Second Law(this is our second sem and we were taught only the First Law in school)our professor gave us a brief introduction to the "physics" part of the law.Of course he resorted to the convenient statement of the Second Law:"Every system has an efficiency of less than unity."
Fair enough,but he proceeded to give an example which perturbed me.He equated the Law to the fact that friction can never be eliminated completely and these are the losses that lead to an efficiency of less than one.He talked of transmission lines and the losses due to i2r heating.He then talked of superconducting materials and how they eliminate such losses.But they require very low temperatures for operation and hence are not isolated systems.So I pointed out that we are working on high temperature superconducting materials(we have a lab for it in our department).So he says that it is not possible to create superconducting materials at room temperatures.If they are created some day,the Second Law will be violated.
So my question is this,if I come up with a superconducting material at room temperature tomorrow will the Second Law stand violated?

I had been simultaneously reading the Lectures' take on the Second Law and have drawn the conclusion that all it says is you can not go from an unorganized energy source to an organized one without any cost ie. efficiency of such processes can never be 100%.However if you wish to convert electrical energy into heat you can go 100%.The Law does not say anything about friction or dissipation work being the fundamental reason we have efficiency of less than 1.

I could be wrong in my own interpretation or the way I see the particular problem.But I want to know without the context of this problem,if we were to create a superconducting material at room temperature with R strictly zero,will the Second Law be violated?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
If yes,how?No, the Second Law would not be violated. The Second Law states that it is impossible to convert heat completely into work, meaning that the efficiency of any system is always less than 1. Superconducting materials at room temperature would not violate the Second Law because they would still suffer losses due to other factors such as thermal energy or quantum mechanical effects. In other words, even though the resistance of a superconductor may be zero at room temperature, there would still be losses associated with the system, meaning that the efficiency would still be less than one.
 

FAQ: Would Room Temperature Superconductors Violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

What is the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the total entropy of a closed system always increases over time. In other words, energy becomes less available for use as it is transformed or transferred from one form to another.

What is the difference between the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics?

The First Law of Thermodynamics deals with the conservation of energy, stating that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted. The Second Law focuses on the direction and quality of energy transfer, stating that energy naturally tends towards a state of disorder or randomness.

How is the Second Law of Thermodynamics interpreted?

The Second Law can be interpreted in different ways, but the most commonly accepted interpretation is that of the increase of entropy over time. Entropy is a measure of the disorder or randomness of a system and the Second Law states that this measure will always increase or stay the same.

What is the significance of the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

The Second Law has many implications in various fields such as physics, chemistry, biology and engineering. It helps explain the direction of natural processes and the limits of energy conversion. It also plays a crucial role in understanding the efficiency of energy systems and the sustainability of natural processes.

Are there any exceptions to the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

There are some cases where it may seem like the Second Law is violated, but upon closer examination, it is found to hold true. For example, living organisms are able to decrease their own entropy, but in doing so, they increase the overall entropy of their surroundings. Another example is the formation of crystals, which may appear to decrease entropy locally, but the overall process still follows the Second Law.

Back
Top