- #36
8LPF16
- 191
- 0
Antonio,
It is no wonder I have not heard much on the monopole, because there is no such thing. By the time you get even close to the
"theoretical smallness" needed, the object being divided would lose the proportionate mass / charge necessary for a reading of magnetic value. This is why simultaneuous actions can and do exist. There are things this small, and they can not exist alone.
The neutral value is the closest thing to this definition. It relates to both (N/S) because it is neither. Not because it is both. It is the bridge that you speak of, just as NOW is neutral to past and future on a 2 time line theory. From the present prespective, NOW is neither; from a fixed point in "before" time (the past), NOW appears to be both. The "was" future becomes NOW in the same way that the "was" past was once the NOW. When you understand this, you see that most of Science is predicated on theories that work from the "past" perspective. This is because of how reality appears to us naturally; WE are fixed points in time from the moment of our birth, and everything that we encounter in life has a fixed point of "beginning", and a predictable "end".
Here is the Scintific proof of what I just said (us thinking that what was past is NOW). I will use quotes from your last post.
QUOTE "Prism as used by Newton to separate the wavelength of sunlight was no doubt one of the great discoveries of science.(1)
...
"The technical name of a "super-prism" is called diffraction grating. Diffraction grating was 1st constructed by the American astronomer David Rittenhouse in 1785. There is no evidence that he used it for any serious scientific experiment."(2)
...
"Spectroscopy is the most productive science of applied physics. It is used by physicists, astronomers, chemists, biologist, metallurgists, "all use it as a routine tool of unsurpassed accuracy and precision, as a detector of atomic species to determine the characteristics of heavenly bodies and the presence of atmospheres in the planets, to study the structures of molecules and atoms, and to obtain a thousand and one items of information without which modern science would be greatly handicapped." Quote by Richardson Gratings."(3)UNQUOTE
This experiment in (1) is UNDUPLICATABLE. It has catastophic flaw in the instructions for replacating the experiment elsewhere. There is no distance specified, and ONLY 1 specific distance produces a "rainbow" on the wall. THEREFORE, I will NEVER reproduce said results from other distances, and the theory is flawed. Not wrong in its' singular prediction, just INCOMPLETE truth.
Yet, as quote (3) truthfully explains, almost everything else is based on this partial picture of true reality. The colors that are absorbed or reflected are based on the colors (freq) that the particle is made from. So trying to understand what is happening without a rigorous study of the interactions of color (resonant freqs) is futile. It can (and has) produce theories that "work", but they are MIRROR images of the "alternate" reality. They exchange values for PAST with NOW, and have many problems with singularities, probabilities, infinities, and uncertainty, etc. Science has "sold out" from the sense that they have abandoned the scientific principle of accurate predictions. Science refuses to admit their inherent lack of complete understanding, and has marched forward (with the financial tenure of Dept. of Defense funding) with the view that the system of Nature operates semi-randomly, and can't be predicted. If they said otherwise, there financial future would be seriously questioned.
With modified prismatic experiments, a more complete picture develops. It is unbelievable that these, and quote (2) have not been done. TRY IT !
LPF
here:https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=13565
It is no wonder I have not heard much on the monopole, because there is no such thing. By the time you get even close to the
"theoretical smallness" needed, the object being divided would lose the proportionate mass / charge necessary for a reading of magnetic value. This is why simultaneuous actions can and do exist. There are things this small, and they can not exist alone.
The neutral value is the closest thing to this definition. It relates to both (N/S) because it is neither. Not because it is both. It is the bridge that you speak of, just as NOW is neutral to past and future on a 2 time line theory. From the present prespective, NOW is neither; from a fixed point in "before" time (the past), NOW appears to be both. The "was" future becomes NOW in the same way that the "was" past was once the NOW. When you understand this, you see that most of Science is predicated on theories that work from the "past" perspective. This is because of how reality appears to us naturally; WE are fixed points in time from the moment of our birth, and everything that we encounter in life has a fixed point of "beginning", and a predictable "end".
Here is the Scintific proof of what I just said (us thinking that what was past is NOW). I will use quotes from your last post.
QUOTE "Prism as used by Newton to separate the wavelength of sunlight was no doubt one of the great discoveries of science.(1)
...
"The technical name of a "super-prism" is called diffraction grating. Diffraction grating was 1st constructed by the American astronomer David Rittenhouse in 1785. There is no evidence that he used it for any serious scientific experiment."(2)
...
"Spectroscopy is the most productive science of applied physics. It is used by physicists, astronomers, chemists, biologist, metallurgists, "all use it as a routine tool of unsurpassed accuracy and precision, as a detector of atomic species to determine the characteristics of heavenly bodies and the presence of atmospheres in the planets, to study the structures of molecules and atoms, and to obtain a thousand and one items of information without which modern science would be greatly handicapped." Quote by Richardson Gratings."(3)UNQUOTE
This experiment in (1) is UNDUPLICATABLE. It has catastophic flaw in the instructions for replacating the experiment elsewhere. There is no distance specified, and ONLY 1 specific distance produces a "rainbow" on the wall. THEREFORE, I will NEVER reproduce said results from other distances, and the theory is flawed. Not wrong in its' singular prediction, just INCOMPLETE truth.
Yet, as quote (3) truthfully explains, almost everything else is based on this partial picture of true reality. The colors that are absorbed or reflected are based on the colors (freq) that the particle is made from. So trying to understand what is happening without a rigorous study of the interactions of color (resonant freqs) is futile. It can (and has) produce theories that "work", but they are MIRROR images of the "alternate" reality. They exchange values for PAST with NOW, and have many problems with singularities, probabilities, infinities, and uncertainty, etc. Science has "sold out" from the sense that they have abandoned the scientific principle of accurate predictions. Science refuses to admit their inherent lack of complete understanding, and has marched forward (with the financial tenure of Dept. of Defense funding) with the view that the system of Nature operates semi-randomly, and can't be predicted. If they said otherwise, there financial future would be seriously questioned.
With modified prismatic experiments, a more complete picture develops. It is unbelievable that these, and quote (2) have not been done. TRY IT !
LPF
here:https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=13565
Last edited: