Compute Residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at Negative Integers & 0

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Poles
In summary, the residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at each of its poles (located at the negative integers and 0) can be calculated using the formula $\text{Res} = \frac{(-1)^m}{m!}$, where $m$ is the pole's order. This can be derived by using the functional equation $\Gamma(z+1) = z\Gamma(z)$ and substituting into the limit definition of the residue.
  • #1
Dustinsfl
2,281
5
Compute the residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at each of its poles.

So the poles are at the negative integers and 0. I suspect there must be a formula than since this is an infinite set.

$\Gamma(z) = \dfrac{e^{-\gamma z}}{z}\prod\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(1+\dfrac{z}{n}\right)^{-1}e^{z/n}$

Should I start by logarithmically differentiating?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just a thought (I don't know if it'll work), but maybe using the $\Gamma$ function's integral representation (remember we have to split the integral several times in order to extend it past a certain integer) and using Fubini's theorem. Something along these lines.
 
  • #3
Jose27 said:
Just a thought (I don't know if it'll work), but maybe using the $\Gamma$ function's integral representation (remember we have to split the integral several times in order to extend it past a certain integer) and using Fubini's theorem. Something along these lines.

$\displaystyle\Gamma(z) =\int_0^{\infty}e^{-t}t^z\dfrac{dt}{t}$

What should I do with this?

---------- Post added at 21:29 ---------- Previous post was at 20:37 ----------

The $\text{Res} = \lim\limits_{z\to -m}(z+m)\Gamma(z)$ and we can write $\Gamma(z) = \dfrac{\Gamma(z+m)}{(z+m-1)(z+m-2)\cdots (z+1)z}$ for the $\text{Re} z> -m$.

By substitution, we have
$$
\text{Res} = \lim_{z\to -m}(z+m)\Gamma(z) = \lim_{z\to -m}(z+m)\frac{\Gamma(z+m)}{(z+m-1)(z+m-2)\cdots (z+1)z}.
$$

By definition, we have $(z+m)\Gamma(z+m) = \Gamma(z+m+1)$.

So
$$
\text{Res} = \lim_{z\to -m}\frac{\Gamma(z+m+1)}{(z+m-1)(z+m-2)\cdots (z+1)z} = \frac{\Gamma(1) = 1}{(-1)(-2)\cdots (-m)} = \frac{(-1)^m}{m!}.
$$
 
Last edited:
  • #4
dwsmith said:
$$
\text{Res} = \ldots = \frac{(-1)^m}{m!}.
$$
That is correct. The functional equation $\Gamma(z+1) = z\Gamma(z)$ is the key to the calculation.
 
  • #5


Yes, starting with logarithmically differentiating would be a good approach. Let's begin by writing the logarithmically differentiated form of $\Gamma(z)$:

$\dfrac{\Gamma'(z)}{\Gamma(z)} = -\gamma + \dfrac{1}{z} - \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(\dfrac{1}{z+n}+\dfrac{1}{n}\right)$

Next, we can use the fact that the residue of a function at a pole $z_0$ is given by the coefficient of $(z-z_0)^{-1}$ in the Laurent series expansion of the function around that pole. In this case, we can see that the only poles of $\Gamma(z)$ are at the negative integers and 0, so we can expand the above expression around each of these poles to find their respective residues.

For the pole at $z=0$, we have:

$\dfrac{\Gamma'(z)}{\Gamma(z)} = -\gamma + \dfrac{1}{z} - \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(\dfrac{1}{z+n}+\dfrac{1}{n}\right) = -\gamma + \dfrac{1}{z} + \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(\dfrac{1}{n}-\dfrac{1}{z+n}\right)$

We can see that the coefficient of $(z-0)^{-1}$ is simply 1, so the residue at $z=0$ is 1.

For the poles at the negative integers, we can use the fact that the Laurent series expansion of $\Gamma(z)$ around a pole $z=-n$ is given by:

$\Gamma(z) = \dfrac{(-1)^n}{n!}\left(\dfrac{1}{z+n}+\dfrac{1}{n}\right)^{-1}e^{z/n}$

Therefore, the residue at $z=-n$ is given by the coefficient of $(z+n)^{-1}$ in this expansion, which is simply $(-1)^n$. So the residues at the negative integers are $(-1)^n$.

In summary, the residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at the pole $z=-n$ is $(-1)^n$, and the residue at
 

Related to Compute Residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at Negative Integers & 0

1. What is the definition of the residue of a function at a point?

The residue of a function at a point is the coefficient of the term with a negative power in the Laurent series expansion of the function around that point. It is used to calculate the value of the function at that point, especially in cases where the function is not defined at that point.

2. Why is it important to compute the residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at negative integers and 0?

The function $\Gamma(z)$, also known as the gamma function, is not defined at negative integers and 0. However, computing the residue at these points allows us to extend the function to these points and obtain meaningful values. This is particularly useful in many mathematical and scientific applications that involve the gamma function.

3. How is the residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at negative integers and 0 calculated?

The residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at a negative integer $-n$ is given by the formula $\frac{(-1)^n}{n!}$, where $n$ is a positive integer. The residue at 0 is given by the formula $(-1)^n B_n$, where $B_n$ is the $n$th Bernoulli number.

4. Can the residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at negative integers and 0 be expressed in terms of other functions?

Yes, the residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at negative integers and 0 can also be expressed in terms of the Riemann zeta function and the Bernoulli numbers. For example, the residue at $-1$ can be written as $\frac{\zeta(2)}{2\pi}$ and the residue at 0 can be written as $\frac{\zeta(2n+2)}{2(2n+2)!}B_{2n+2}$.

5. What are some applications of computing the residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at negative integers and 0?

Some applications include calculating complex integrals, evaluating infinite sums and products, and solving differential equations. The residue of $\Gamma(z)$ at negative integers and 0 can also be used in number theory, probability, and statistical physics.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
507
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top