- #1
binbagsss
- 1,256
- 11
Homework Statement
Apologies if this is a stupid question but just thinking about the see-saw rule applied to something like:
## w_v \nabla_u V^v = w^v \nabla_u V_v ##
It is not obvious that the two are equivalent to me since one comes with a minus sign for the connection and one with a plus sign for the connection.
I guess just to stupidly ask whether you are okay to use the see-saw here, and if there is a quick, obvious way of showing the two are equivalent.
Homework Equations
the see-saw rule
The Attempt at a Solution
## w_v \nabla_u V^v = w_v(\partial_u V^v + \Gamma_{uc}^v V^c) ##[1]
##w^v \nabla_u V_v = w^v (\partial_u V_v - \Gamma_{uv}^c V_c)##[1]
i can rename dummy indicies ##u## and ##c## but can't really see this helping?
thanks .