Homeomorphisms Send Bdries to Bdries

  • Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the properties of homeomorphisms between two closed disks, D^ and D, and how they map interior and boundary points. It is argued that interior points are sent to interior points, while boundary points are sent to boundary points. The possibility of extending a homeomorphism from D^ to D is also mentioned, as well as the need to define boundary points in the topological space \bar{D} without relying on an embedding in the plane. It is ultimately concluded that homeomorphisms between two closed disks preserve the topological properties of interior and boundary points.
  • #1
Bacle
662
1
Hi, All:

Say D^ is a closed disk standardly-embedded in the plane, and D is its interior.

I have an argument to the effect that any homeomorphism h:D^-->D^ sends boundary pts
to boundary points, but it seems kind of clunky, and I wonder if someone has a nicer,
cleaner one:

First, we show interior points are sent to interior points:

We take x in D. Since h is a homeo., h(D) is open, and h(x) lies in h(D). By openness
of h(D), there is an open set Ux containing h(x), so interior points are sent to interior points.

It follows, by considering the exterior of D^ as the complement of the disk, that
exterior points (i.e., those in R^2-D^ )

Now, the kind-of-clunky part:

We show that if x is a boundary point of D , so that every 'hood Vx of x intersects
points both in the interior of D and in the exterior of D, the same is the case for
h(Vx).

So the points in Ext(D^)/\Vx are sent to points in Ext(D^)/\h(Vx) , as a consequence

of the fact that exterior points are sent to exterior points.

Anyone know a nicer way?

Same for the interior points.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A subtlety that you need to be careful about: you initially talk about homeomorphisms [itex]\bar{D}\to\bar{D}[/itex] but then you implicitly assume instead that you have a homeomorphism [itex]\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}^2[/itex] which preserves the disc. Now I'm certain that if you have the former you can extend to to the latter, but you would have to prove it first (I can see a straightforward way to do this but it requires the result you're trying to prove).

If you are talking only about the topological space [itex]\bar{D}[/itex] then you need to firstly define what you mean by 'boundary points', using only this space (not the embedding in the plane). One possibility is 'points that have no open n'hood homeomorphic to [itex]\mathbb{R}^2[/itex]'. Then this will be invariant under homeomorphisms straightforwardly.
 
  • #3
Thanks, henry_m:

I was actually trying to rigorize a statement I saw made about homeomorphisms

from D^ to D^ , in which one was asked to show that interior points are sent to

interior points and boundary ones to boundary ones. The statement did not mention

manifold boundaries like the ones you refer to, so I assumed an embedding was

implicit. But your point is a good one, and it brings up that question: I think that

the answer is that every homeo of the disk can be extended; this has to see with

the fact that there are no knots in R^2, and Schoenflies theorem. Others may

improve on this.
 
  • #4
I don't think you need to be that sophisticated, and you can get all the way without mentioning an embedding.

It is clear that in the closed disc, topologically there are exactly two distinct types of points. If you use my definition of an interior point (n'hood homeomorphic to the plane), it is quick to see that homeomorphisms map interior points to interior points. Let x be interior. Let U be a n'hood of x homeomorphic to the plane. Then the restriction of h to U is also a homeomorphism between U and h(U), so h(U) is homeomorphic to the plane also. Thus h(x) is interior.

Since the boundary points are then just 'all the other points', the same argument shows that boundary points map to boundary points.
 
  • #5
i think this is not so obvious. i would use something like this: a boundary point has a neighborhood basis of open sets, such that removing the boundary point renders them contractible, but no interior point has such a neighborhood.
 

Related to Homeomorphisms Send Bdries to Bdries

1. What is a homeomorphism?

A homeomorphism is a mathematical concept that describes a function between two topological spaces that is continuous, bijective, and has a continuous inverse. In simpler terms, a homeomorphism is a function that preserves the basic structure of a space, such as its shape and size.

2. What does it mean for a homeomorphism to send boundaries to boundaries?

When a homeomorphism is applied to a topological space, it will map the boundaries of that space to the boundaries of the resulting space. In other words, the homeomorphism will preserve the boundaries of the space and will not alter them in any way.

3. How is the concept of homeomorphism used in real-world applications?

Homeomorphisms have a wide range of applications in various fields such as physics, engineering, and computer science. They are used to study the properties of different objects and spaces, and are also used in image processing and pattern recognition algorithms.

4. Can a homeomorphism be applied to any two objects or spaces?

No, a homeomorphism can only be applied to objects or spaces that have the same underlying topological structure. For example, a square and a circle can be homeomorphic because they both have the topological structure of a closed loop, but a square and a line cannot be homeomorphic.

5. Are there any limitations or drawbacks to using homeomorphisms?

Homeomorphisms are a powerful mathematical tool, but they do have some limitations. For example, they cannot be used to compare two spaces that have different dimensions. Additionally, some complex spaces may not have a homeomorphism at all, making it difficult to study their properties using this concept.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
121
Replies
1
Views
251
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top