Something on Baire categories

[wrobel]

There is an assertion that follows from very general theorem directly and I do not understand if this assertion trivial or it may be of some interest. The assertion is enclosed below please comment

 

[jvicens]

I would like to provide some insight on the assertion mentioned in the forum post. Without knowing the specific theorem and assertion in question, it is difficult for me to comment on the exact nature of the assertion. However, I can provide some general thoughts on the matter.

Firstly, it is important to note that any assertion that follows directly from a general theorem may not necessarily be trivial. The fact that it is derived from a theorem suggests that it has some level of complexity and is not just a simple, obvious statement. It may require further analysis and understanding to fully grasp its significance.

Secondly, the interest level of the assertion may vary depending on the field of study and the context in which it is being applied. What may seem trivial to one person may be of great interest to another, depending on their background and expertise. Hence, it is difficult to make a general statement about the interest level of the assertion without knowing more details.

Lastly, as a scientist, I would suggest delving deeper into the assertion and its relation to the general theorem. This can help in understanding the significance and implications of the assertion. It may also be helpful to consult with other experts in the field and discuss their perspectives on the matter.

In conclusion, it is difficult for me to comment on the specific assertion without more information. However, I believe that any assertion derived from a general theorem should not be dismissed as trivial and may have interesting implications worth exploring.