Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta

In summary, the conversation discusses the algebraic properties of the Dirac delta function and its derivatives. It is explained that the Dirac delta is not a function, but a generalized function with defined properties such as n-th order derivatives. Different ways of defining the Dirac delta are mentioned, including one as a limit of a series of continuous functions. The possibility of using the definition of the k-th derivative to construct an expansion is also brought up.
  • #1
friend
1,452
9
I'm trying to understand how the algebraic properties of the Dirac delta function might be passed onto the argument of the delta function.

One way to go from a function to its argument is to derive a Taylor series expansion of the function in terms of its argument. Then you are dealing with the argument and powers of it.

Normally, the Taylor series expansion for f(x) is:
[tex]f(x) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {\frac{{{f^{(n)}}({x_0})}}{{n!}} \cdot {{(x - {x_0})}^n}} [/tex]

But how does this change for a composite function? How do you expand [itex]f(g(x))[/itex]? Do you just replace x in the sum with g(x) and x0 with g(x0)? Or do you differentiat f(g(x)) with respect to x in each term before setting x to x0?

But I suspect the even harder question is how do you take the derivatives of the Dirac delta function for each term in the sum. And if you have to evaluate it at x0, won't that make each term infinity? Is there an easy expression for [itex]{\delta ^{(n)}}({x_0})[/itex]? Or better yet, how do we evaluate [itex]{\delta ^{(n)}}(g(x))[/itex]? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The mistake you are making is that the Dirac delta is not a function. It has some properties of a function, and is sometimes called a generalized function (better known as distribution). One of these is that you can define an n-th order derivative. But one of the things you can't do is write down a series, see for example this old PF thread.

There are different ways to define the Dirac delta. Normally, in distribution theory, it is defined by the way it acts as integration kernel, i.e. by the property [itex]\int \delta(x) f(x) \, dx = f(0)[/itex]. However, you can write it down as the limit of a series of continuous functions, my favourite one being
[tex]\delta_a(x) = \frac{1}{a \sqrt{\pi}} e^{-x^2 / a^2}[/tex]
such that [itex]\delta(x) = \lim_{a \to 0} \delta_a(x)[/itex]
and of course you are free to expand [itex]\delta_a(x)[/itex] because it's as smooth as you could possibly wish.
 
  • #3
CompuChip said:
The mistake you are making is that the Dirac delta is not a function. It has some properties of a function, and is sometimes called a generalized function (better known as distribution). One of these is that you can define an n-th order derivative. But one of the things you can't do is write down a series, see for example this old PF thread.

There are different ways to define the Dirac delta. Normally, in distribution theory, it is defined by the way it acts as integration kernel, i.e. by the property [itex]\int \delta(x) f(x) \, dx = f(0)[/itex]. However, you can write it down as the limit of a series of continuous functions, my favourite one being
[tex]\delta_a(x) = \frac{1}{a \sqrt{\pi}} e^{-x^2 / a^2}[/tex]
such that [itex]\delta(x) = \lim_{a \to 0} \delta_a(x)[/itex]
and of course you are free to expand [itex]\delta_a(x)[/itex] because it's as smooth as you could possibly wish.

I was thinking more in terms like this for the kth derivative of the delta,
[tex]{\delta ^{(k)}}[\varphi ] = {( - 1)^k}{\varphi ^{(k)}}(0)[/tex]
that I found about a third of the way down on the wikipedia.com website for the Dirac delta. Could this be used to construct an expansion? I don't know if the [itex]\varphi [/itex] here can be used as the g(x) in my composition.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Yes, this is the definition as you would get it from distribution theory, where the Dirac delta would be defined by the way it "acts on" other functions [itex]\phi[/itex].
This definition is what I said earlier:
[tex]\int \delta(x) \phi(x) dx = \phi(0)[/tex]

To find the k'th derivative, apply partial integration k times to
[tex]\int \delta^{(k)}(x) f(x) dx[/tex]
to move it over to the test function f(x). This gives
[tex]\int \delta^{(k)}(x) f(x) dx = (-1)^k \int \delta(x) f^{(k)}(x) \, dx[/tex]
which is [itex](-1)^k f^{(k)}(0)[/itex] by the definition applied to [itex]\phi = f^{(k)}[/itex].
 
  • #5


The Dirac delta function is a mathematical construct that represents an infinitely narrow spike at a specific point, with an area of 1 under the spike. It is not a conventional function, so it cannot be expanded using a Taylor series in the traditional sense. However, there are ways to approximate the Dirac delta function using a series of functions.

One approach is to use a sequence of functions, such as a Gaussian function, that become increasingly narrow and tall as the sequence approaches the Dirac delta function. This allows for a Taylor series expansion to be applied to the sequence of functions, which can then be used to approximate the properties of the Dirac delta function.

Another approach is to use the theory of distributions, which extends the concept of a function to a broader class of objects that includes the Dirac delta function. In this framework, the Dirac delta function is defined as a linear functional that acts on a test function, and its derivatives can be calculated using integration by parts.

In either case, the algebraic properties of the Dirac delta function, such as its ability to "pass on" to the argument, can be understood through its definition and the properties of the approximating functions or distributions. It is important to note that the Dirac delta function is a tool for mathematical convenience and should be used with caution, as its properties can lead to unexpected results if not used correctly.
 

Related to Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta

1. What is a Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta?

A Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta is a mathematical technique used to represent the Dirac delta function, which is a theoretical function that is zero everywhere except at the origin, where it is infinite. The Taylor series expansion allows us to approximate the Dirac delta function using a finite number of terms, making it easier to work with in calculations and theoretical models.

2. Why is the Dirac delta function important in science?

The Dirac delta function is important in science because it allows us to model and understand many physical phenomena, particularly those involving point particles or point sources. It is also used in signal processing, probability theory, and quantum mechanics, among other fields.

3. How is a Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta calculated?

A Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta is calculated by using the Maclaurin series, which is a special case of the Taylor series where the expansion is centered at x=0. The formula for the Maclaurin series of the Dirac delta function is: f(x) = sum from n=0 to infinity of [f^(n)(0)/n!] * x^n, where f^(n)(0) is the nth derivative of f(x) evaluated at x=0.

4. What are some real-world applications of the Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta?

The Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta has many real-world applications, including in electrical engineering, where it is used to model the behavior of capacitors and inductors in circuits. It is also used in fluid dynamics to model fluid flow around obstacles and in quantum field theory to describe the behavior of elementary particles.

5. Are there any limitations to using the Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta?

Yes, there are some limitations to using the Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta. One limitation is that it is only an approximation and becomes less accurate as the number of terms increases. Another limitation is that it only works for functions that are infinitely differentiable, which means they have an infinite number of derivatives at every point. Additionally, the Taylor series expansion of Dirac delta can only be used for functions that are defined on a finite interval.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
340
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
789
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
885
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
1K
Back
Top