PeterDonis

T

• T

  Tanelorn

• Jun 22, 2024

fwiw I interpreted these other Ibix statements as meaning that someone here has to be able to look at both clocks, not that the clock at the BB last scattering itself also needs to be able to see our clock here. I am still not sure why it needs to. Perhaps Ibix should try to be clearer.
I enjoy Cosmology, but I only get a few hours a year to read about it. If you want to know anything about RF engineering you let me know

• 

  jedishrfu

• Mar 26, 2024

Mentor

Insights Author

Hi Peter,

I figure you might need something to cheer you up with all these nasty comments on your feed.

https://tubitv.com/tv-shows/716700/s01-e01-my-favorite-martian

Cheers,
Jedi

M

• M

  Matthew-Champion

• Apr 7, 2021

I am perplexed at the cognitive dissonance you have when dealing in matters of clarification. You closed a thread suggesting that I was not attempting to educate myself further in maths which is exactly what I was trying to do. It is no wonder I cannot learn more mathematics if the people I ask for clarification and help have a similar disposition to you.

N

• Namewastaken

• Apr 25, 2020

Thanks for moving my thread! I am so overcome with the excitement of ideas I didn't care to appreciate or respect the order in how to express it, and that was rude of me, so I apologize for that.

• 

  Marcin

• Apr 2, 2020

You've left again. You've asked the question and didn't wait for the answer. This is the answer (part 2/2):
I don't care "What does QM predict for such statistical results?" or "How does this hypothesis arise from the math of QM? (Hint: it doesn't.)" because, as you said, it doesn't predict it. QM tells nothing about it. The only way to know is the experiment. I can tell that you were waiting for me to use a lousy expression. Bravo.

• 

  Marcin

• Apr 2, 2020

You've left again. You've asked the question and didn't wait for the answer. This is the answer (part 1/2):
This is the uncertainty value:##Δt=(l_2−l_1)/c##
This is the uncertainty range:##<−Δt;+Δt>##
This is the result range:##<t−Δt;t+Δt>##

S

• S

  SteveKlinko

• Apr 21, 2019

That was Rude. I read the articles: I want an electronic device that could be used in a non lab setting. The Lamb Shift is difficult to measure even in the lab. The Casimir Effect is bulk net effect. Since the SET is dealing with single electrons maybe it could be influenced by single QVFs and that this influence could be measured by appropriate amplification. If there is no such thing as QVFs then ok.

• 

  Dfpolis

• Apr 15, 2019

I do not appreciate you closing my thread before I could respond. "Entitlement to belief" was a courtesy to one who abandon the field rather than answering my response.

The criterion for closing a thread should not be that one is questioning a widely held position. The response assumed that the definition of "spin" as intrinsic angular momentum had been abandoned without notice by Bell in his proof.

• 

  jim hardy

• Mar 16, 2019

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

oops meant 185

• 

  jim hardy

• Mar 16, 2019

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

trying to help with MCAS see #158 ? oops 185

• 

  Peter Morgan

• Feb 23, 2019

Gold Member

May I ask for a different resolution for my thread "Schrödinger's cat: what's the state?" Instead of locking the thread, please could we delete the comments of mine and yours that led to you locking it? I can agree that my comments there are too much in my own research line, but the question itself seems open to discussion within conventional norms.

• 

  Wes Tausend

• Dec 10, 2017

Gold Member

Peter, if it is I who caused the "Does the "space twin" benefit from length contraction?" to be closed, please discipline me and allow others to post if they wish. My apologies. Thanks, Wes

• 

  wolram

• May 11, 2015

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

Peter,can you tell me why my thread Time and the universe was closed
cheers,

T

• T

  TheScienceOrca

• Sep 23, 2014

I appreciate the recent posts on the thread explaining why I was wrong instead of just saying I was.