This is the profile for member arivero. This page shows details about arivero like postings stats, blog posts, latest posts, trophies won and interests. If you want to follow or message this user you must register an account.
arivero

arivero

Gold Member
A PF Mountain
Joined
Last seen
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
175
Points
258

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About Trophies

  • J
    Gold Member
    Hi, in your paper "The strange formula of Dr. Koide" you mention your list of
    phenomenologically inspired relationships, which is supposed to be available at http://www.physcomments.org/wiki/index.php?title=Bakery:HdV . This site is no longer online and I was wondering if it is still available somewhere?
    J
    jakob1111
    • Like
    Likes arivero
    arivero
    arivero
    • Like
    Likes jakob1111
    arivero
    Gold Member
    Second instalment, I do not know how to title it. The topic is "reorganizing 496" to see if we can go down to SSM, or sideways to E8
    arivero
    arivero
    \begin{array}{llll}
    496=\\
    {\bf (1,24,1^c) }&+{\bf [1,15,\bar 3^c]}&+{\bf [1, \bar {15}, 3^c]}&+\\
    1,24,8^c&+[1,10,\bar 6^c]&+[1,\bar {10},6^c]&+\\
    (1,1,8^c)&&&+\\&(2,5,3^c)&+(2,\bar 5,\bar 3^c)&+\\
    &(1,1,1^c)&+[1,1,1^c]\\
    \end{array}
    This is straight from a Gellmann-Ramond-Slansky https://inspirehep.net/record/112502?ln=es
    We apply (2.18) to get SO(32)
    to [itex]SO(2) \times SU(5) \times SU(3) \times U(1)[/itex]
    arivero
    arivero
    SO(2N) has in some sense a concept of antiparticle, say [itex] x^\dagger[/itex], inherited of SU(N) via [itex]2N = N + \bar N[/itex]. We can use it to rearrange group elements, for instance the combinations that are going to branch into (N,N) and (Adj N, 1)+(1,Adj N) under decomposition to [itex]SO(N) \times SO(N)[/itex], or very similarly to U(N).
    arivero
    arivero
    So for SO(32) we have 496 = 256 + (120+120), but somehow this 256 does not seem to be the one that is divided in 128+128 by stringers. On the other hand we can also recombine as [itex]x\pm x^\dagger[/itex] but we get (120 + 120) + (120 + 136). It adds to 240 + 256 but it doesnt look as E8xE8; no SO(16) spinor :-(
    arivero
    Gold Member
    Ok, so lets go: "Some symmetries of the scalar sector of the SSM" The three generations supersymmetric standard model.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…

Find Member

Recent Insights

Back
Top