Recent content by AshUchiha

I'm sorry, how did you solve the B) part?

I don't think we can change the fundamentals of physics, can we? I mean if I can make a new theory that could replace Newton's theory. Even then I would have to abide the fundamentals? Or can I come up with my own fundamentals which is also a good explanation of all the physical phenomenon

Is it much like the nature of light? I mean we can't completely define gravity but we do have some theories which cover more or less about the phenomenon caused by gravity. Similar to light, we accept that it has dual nature because there is no other theory which best explains all the properties...

Another thing, do Newton and Einstein have different models of Gravity. If so, which one is true? Or are they more like String theory and Big bang theory?

Reminds me of Big Bang theory, physics bowl Wolwitz dialogue

I won't, what's the point of taking it anyway. The older you grow the weaker your metabolism becomes, the cure just slows down the expiring process of the body but it will still expire. Since it would expire slower than before you would have to bear a lot more pain than if you wouldn't be had...

I really need to get the real definition of Gravity and how it works on planets, stars and probably on every object. I think you it would help explaining mathematically in the intermediate level. I don't understand you there, do you mean to say that gravity does not have a well-defined unit...

I think the color of the banana is directly proportional to the number of apples? I meant Gravity is directly proportional to mass , true?. But according to you they aren't related. So, in the case of planets they don't have a large mass, therefore, they would face proportionally less gravity...

I've heard even in a vacuum, there are still some forces which are on the act. Further, yes Earth is in a vacuum but it is under the gravitational influence of other bodies. Thanks for your kind reply. In short, if an object is very dense, it can collapse into a black hole? No matter how less...

Different YouTubers and references have different opinions, so I don't know what to choose. So you mean to say when matter gets dense to a certain point it becomes a black hole? That's nice to know but I'm afraid my actual question isn't answered to my satisfactory level. I want to know, why is...

I will try to be as literal as I can. I was researching about the black hole, according to NASA and much other organisation a black hole form when a star collapses under its own gravity. "Stellar black holes form when the center of a very massive star collapses in upon itself". Gravity is...

Ellipsis, loved the way you explained. But I wanted definitions, of course your explanation is awesome. But you know I wanted definition in a simple way meanwhile not dishonoring it's scientific meaning. But still learned a lot from you sir. Anyway, I've always been confused that, every action...

But "traveled" would again be wrong I guess, because if path traveled comes under distance, then what does distance traveled means? Is it just an adjective?

What exactly do you mean by "actual path" . And you used the word "taken" , seems a bit...uneasy for me to digest {That's an idiom}. Would it be right to rearrange your definition to "The total path traveled by an object"

Can you add "distance" in your definition's too ?? P.S. And yes, more for yourself.