Recent content by brunardot

Amen, Amen, and Amen. Amen! Again, Amen! And, once again, Amen! Yes, but by definition: the simplest must be the most complex.

Hector's logic is impeccable Hector's logic is impeccable. It is at the crux of understanding Reality. Technically, I prefer the term Reality, to Hector's use of the term "universe" (this is a semantical problem that can easily be satisfied), which is a singularity; and thus, always...

I disagree I disagee; as you also have the right to. I suspect we will need Korzybski (now dead) to referee.

Yes. but . . . When I first commented "No," I did not like your order of the major and minor diameters. I felt they were contrived to match the integers rather than their ascending order. (You subsequently, reversed them.) I, also, did not like your mixing two circular terms (radius...

I believe I understand the confusion I believe that now I understand the confusion. No. I stated: "the major diameter equals 2v (2 times vector) or p + a (I usually refer to the apogee as "o" because "a" is the amplitude; thought this would confuse, so used "a"; however, with that: p +...

Einstein's Limitations Einstein was well aware of his math limitations; and, complained often to Planck, in letters, of his difficulties.

Einstein's concerns with relativity As to source: private discussions concerning alternative theory with Hans Bethe and Philip Morrison while Einstein was still alive. However, it is also well documented that Einstein spent most of his adult life trying to reconcile SR and GR, which...

?? What part of the below answer do you not understand? "Actually, the major diameter equals 2v or p + a." It was a statement concerning the situation; not intended as flattery.

Einstein Love your epsilon ellipse. Einstein's main contribution to SR and GR is that to his death he was well aware that neither were correct. Unfortionately this has been lost on the Pomo elitists, beginning with Oppenheimer, that now set policy.

I agree with you (and with thanks to Elliot) I completely agree with your assessment, which you have stated well. I was en route to meet Einstein when I heard of his death earlier that morning. You do his memory proud. Love your signature; but your thoughts first caught my...

See First Post and Subsequent Argument See First Post and Subsequent Argument at: "Click" Below Lines https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=83978

? You're very good at cutting to the crux. Actually, the major diameter equals 2v or p + a.

Sorry Sorry, I forgot that there were other interpretations. I was referring to the distance between the foci. Sorry, if I confused.

Solution now rejected. I have reposted your answer below for ease of reference. Now that you have clarified your position, I admit to being overly generous. And, I have, thus, decided to reject your solution for the following three reasons: 1.) The radius of a circle is ambiguous...

Solution accepted I'll accept your solution, as my given statements are difficult to construe. I would prefer: 1 = perigee 0 = soliton (half a wave or half the focal length) 1 = vector (line from a focus to the end of the minor diameter) 1 = apogee 2 = major diameter. You...