While reading http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sullivan/22files/System_analogy_all.pdf article, i encountered the following sentence:
Thus, we see that K is analogous to 1/C , which makes sense, because with a given current for a given time, a smaller capacitor will build up more voltage, whereas with...
Homework Statement
Suppose we have spring which is between two bodies of different mass, with which force spring will act on every of them?
Homework Equations
Spring acts on a body with force kx
The Attempt at a Solution
A-/\/\/\/\/\/\/\-B
Suppose body A has mass 2kg and body B has mass...
Homework Statement
Why integration of $$\frac{D^2\mathbf r}{Dt^2}=−2\mathbf w \times \frac{D\mathbf r}{Dt}−g\mathbf R$$ gives us
$$\frac{D\mathbf r}{Dt}= \mathbf v_0 −2\mathbf w×(\mathbf r−\mathbf r_0)−gt\mathbf R$$
Homework Equations
Consider a time-varying vector written in the body...
Thank you for the reply. But we have shear stress in the middle of bar side. The problem for me is that regarding edges the author says that surface is free and he concludes from it that shear stresses are zeros there. But why then surface is not free in the middle of bar side? Certainly, the...
Now I'm reading part THIN-WALLED HOLLOW SHAFTS
The book says this
We now detach a small element from the wall portion AB (Fig. 201 3.50). Since the upper and lower faces of this element are part of the free surface of the hollow member, the stresses on these faces are equal to zero.
Why its...
I'm currently reading Beer MoM book. There is nothing new for me in this tutorial.
I'm particulary like to understand this passage:
Since the face of the element perpendicular to the y-axis is part of the free surface of the bar, all stresses on this face must be zero.
Homework Statement
I want to understand why in noncicular members in torsion book tells me that surface of a member is free and so no shearing stresses there.
This is from wikipedia for shafts:
Note that the highest shear stress occurs on the surface of the shaft, where the radius is...
The rule to convert between frames is multiply by rotation matrix. But here we add some term, which is strange for me. I can very well understand this in case of measuring angular momentum about different points... Oooo, maybe here they think of different frames also as diferent points to...
Suppose we have an equation in inertial frame A.
\begin{equation}\frac{{}^Ad\bf{H}_C}{dt} = \bf{M}_C\end{equation}
Now we want to switch to body fixed frame B. For this need to employ correction factor {}^A\bf\omega^B\times\bf{H}_B. Why do we have this correction factor? How to derive this...