iste's latest activity
-
iste reacted to Fra's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Like.
The Ad hoc reasoning we have all seen? Sure. But it is elegant and something to strive for? And even if an ad hoc model can later be... -
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.But surely this happens all the time elsewhere in science?
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Well, I guess there is nothing more to be said. I can only reiterate that with Barandes' stochastic-quantum dictionaries like the one...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Then make rebuttles to my points: e.g. The unistochastic marginal probabilities are just the Born probabilities: i.e. measured...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Sure, but its preferable to have a description of the system when its not being measured if you are going to make that speculation...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.I don't think Bohmian mechanics is the correct interpretation or approach either, I just like this example. Maybe Barandes' might...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.I think you and Barandes are overinterpreting what the formalism can possibly say. There is no stochastic process here where the system...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Yes, there is a unistochastic transition matrix at all times, but effectively it is just telling you what would happen if you were to...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.But it doesn't tell you what the system is doing between measurements. Everything thing the unistochastic system is describing is the...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.But Barandes' formalism doesn't work without measurement devices. He has even said in one lecture that the reason you no longer need the...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Only if they don't tell you whats going on between measurements. Something like Bohmian mechanics tells you. Maybe empirically it would...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Not sure I follow. His local causality just seems to correspond to non-signalling. Not sure I agree because it cannot telling us...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Could you elaborate on this? I thought that it at least deflates it. The wavefunction no longer seems essential as an ontology for...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.I would say every model that reproduces the predictions of QM can feasibly used as an underlying explanation for why the measured...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.This is an interesting approach by Khrennikov with many parallels to Barandes approach including the deflationary aspects, albeit...