Recent content by Neo

There's nothing particularly abstruse about the words I used. "Temporal dimension" is an already well-defined term. A cursory online search revealed a seemingly infinite amount of information on the subject. Perhaps you'd prefer "the dimension of time?" The question is how things change...

This link was actually quite helpful. Thanks. I'm in the process of writing a philosophy book while attending college and doing brain tumor research. A PhD from the Harvard lab I was working in said it was "genius." Hopefully I'll be able to publish within the next two years. Wish me luck!

Relativity is not violated by space traveling faster than c. My conjecture is that time splits the universe into three-dimensional progressions by a type of "instataneous" wave action. It would be similar to the propagation of g waves except that rather than having greater g wave propagation...

I'm working on it. :wink: Perhaps you'd like to collaborate? My conjecture is that time splits the universe into three-dimensional progressions by a type of "instataneous" wave action. It would be similar to the propagation of g waves except that rather than having greater g wave propagation...

Does anyone have any insights or experience on this topic?... Steroids (Anabolic-Androgenic) Anabolic-androgenic steroids are man-made substances related to male sex hormones. “Anabolic” refers to muscle-building, and “androgenic” refers to increased masculine characteristics. “Steroids”...

An idea of mine is that there are such things as waves of time that travel faster than luminal velocity in vacuo in the same way that it is possible for space itself to travel faster than c without invalidating relativity.

An idea of mine is that there are such things as waves of time that travel faster than luminal velocity in vacuo in the same way that it is possible for space itself to travel faster than c without invalidating relativity.

Acceleration has meaning to all particles and photons exhibit particulate behavior. I know it "doesn't produce a frame of reference;" the invariance of velocity causes photons to exhibit inertia. The interesting aspect is the reasoning that invalidates vacuum light as an inertial reference...

Not only is a photon a frame of reference but it's also inertial as dv/dt=0. The only thing it's not a good frame of reference for is time. An interesting idea. Because the derivative of the velocity of time (Vt) over time (t) is nonzero, an inertial reference frame is not possible...

Not only is a photon a frame of reference but it's also inertial as dv/dt=0. The only thing it's not a good frame of reference for is time. An interesting idea. Because the derivative of the velocity of time (Vt) over time (t) is nonzero, an inertial reference frame is not possible...

Not necessarily true. The frame of reference could be a form of electromagnetic radiation. For instance, a photon. If you define matter as having mass, you could define a photon as a frame of reference without implicating the existence of matter. Certainly, for the universe to begin...

I, of course, agree with Andrew. The entire situation is isomorphic to dialogue with Christian zealots claiming the theory of evolution is just another cockamamie theory that scientists have put their stock in in the same way that Christians place their faith in god. The term "theory" seems to...

Same here. I just started Calculus-based Physics. It's quite challenging already but I love it.

Please clarify. If singularities are in motion and wave motion from moving massive objects causes ripples in spatial curvature, then why do singularities not exhibit wave-particle duality? Or is duality unnecessary for wave motion to result from a moving dense particle? "Gravity waves are...

Singularities don't exhibit wave-particle duality because they are not in motion? Wave motion from moving massive objects causes ripples in spatial curvature... Are gravitational waves the only type of waves that affect spatial curvature? Can non-gravitational waves affect curvature of...