I more or less agree, though I'm not really one for superlatives. To look at the issue more objectively, you could turn to the job outlook report by the National Association of Colleges and Employers. You have to pay for a copy, but the gist of it is summarized by various news outlets reporting...
It is marketable in the sense that when submitting your application, employers looking for analytical ability (finance, consulting, engineering, etc) will see your degree, say "ok, no issues here", and continue reading the rest of your resume.
thanks for the clarification. i wasn't sure if it was the implementation or function of 'displayed type' that was a problem, or if it was just the syntax.
since i have no control over mathtype's translation to latex, ill just live with it.
After playing around with MathType's translate to LaTeX tool, I noticed it encloses its translated TeX expressions with either $<expression>$ or $$<expression>$$ depending on whether "Inline Equation" is toggled or not.
Being new to TeX, I looked this up, and the wiki page...