Recent content by paulzhen

  1. P

    Why isn't my laminator sticking PET thin films together at high temperatures?

    Hi all, I am trying to laminate two ITO-coated PET thin films together with heating (I believe the temperature generated by my laminator is above 80 Celsius degree), but they did not stick together even a little bit. I have checked online for a few articles, laminating PET with heating (above...
  2. P

    Improving Heating Uniformity on AZO Conductive Glass: What Went Wrong?

    But anyone can tell what exactly is the problem with the over heating near the connections?
  3. P

    Improving Heating Uniformity on AZO Conductive Glass: What Went Wrong?

    Yes the sputtering process should produce a uniform aluminium layer (for my case, the thickness was around 150nm). I still believe this should be a straight forward entry-level experiment, but I have worked on this for a week, tried a lot of different ways, but none of them came out as I...
  4. P

    Improving Heating Uniformity on AZO Conductive Glass: What Went Wrong?

    I tried silver paste today, similar results. I doubt that if this is the right way to heat up a conductive thin film, it is really frustrated. I mean it should be a straight forward experiment, right? Do you know any workable alternative to heat up the film electrically? Or maybe heating the HPC...
  5. P

    Improving Heating Uniformity on AZO Conductive Glass: What Went Wrong?

    The black spots are formed because of that, I tape a aluminium foil as a shield for the center area when doing sputtering, and the edge of the foil did not perfectly taped.
  6. P

    Improving Heating Uniformity on AZO Conductive Glass: What Went Wrong?

    Thanks so much! This is what I have done today: I sputtered aluminum onto the AZO glass, however...the results are similar, the heat was mainly happened near the contact points, and the voltage distribution is also similar as before... I will try liquid metal later, but why the situation did...
  7. P

    Improving Heating Uniformity on AZO Conductive Glass: What Went Wrong?

    Hi! I tried to heat the AZO conductive glass with a current source = 0.5A. However, I found the voltage near the contact points was almost 3 times higher than that on the glass surface (please see the picture for details). It means the heating effect mainly happened near the contact points...
  8. P

    The operator of momentum (layman question)

    oh...yes thanks a lot
  9. P

    The operator of momentum (layman question)

    I found two "forms" of it: p=\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{d}{dx} p=-i\hbar\frac{d}{dx} how could they be the same??
  10. P

    What can be seen if taking a snap shot @ 4.21K? Superconductivity

    Dear Zz, Sorry I have thought for a long time how to make myself clear, but I failed obviously. I just want to keep my post short hence did not tell the background of why I asking this question, because I think you would not interested in. You have answered my original question in your first...
  11. P

    What can be seen if taking a snap shot @ 4.21K? Superconductivity

    Dear Zz, So the "transition range" from 4.22k to 4.20k shown in this diagram is only due to the issues such as impurities or instrument? But I believe it still require "a tiny period of time" to complete forming cooper pairs, right? I am looking for some "proofs" for the exist of this "tiny...
  12. P

    What can be seen if taking a snap shot @ 4.21K? Superconductivity

    In the above picture it is clear that the transition from normal to superconducting states is not infinitesimally sharp, it drops from around 4.22K ~ end at 4.20K. I have two questions for this: 1) I wondering, what can be seen if taking a snap shot in the middle, say @ 4.21K? Would I see...
  13. P

    Zero dipole moment in stationary state?

    P.W. Anderson in his essay "more is different" said that: "no stationary state of a system has an electric dipole moment". He used an example of NH3 to illustrate that. I then checked online and found that, Chemists said there is dipole moment in NH3 molecule, but (nuclear) physicists claim...
Back
Top