So that would mean the more mass something has the more it affects time? This is all I'm wondering if I'm right in some way or another or on the right track or completely wrong. If I'm dead wrong that's okay because asking the question is the most important part.
I know the mc2= the rate of time isn't the right I'm just wondering if it can be proven. Just the idea that time is a real thing and not a paradox. I agree with the traveling in the future but the only way to would to reach just under the speed of light which would affect time itself but how...
Yes, your watch wouldn't drift in time because your still on Earth and yes 20 million would be to small you affect the watch but in a small way it would affect you. That just goes into the math of mc2= rate of time. Time moves at the rate of the objects gravity = the objects mass.
If I was to sit at the base of something that was let's say 20 million tones. If I was to look out after sitting there sometime it would look like everything farther away was moving just a little bit faster and the same in reverse. Because the mass is so great as you said gravity affects time so...
I was watching Stephen Hawking Into the universe and he was talking about time travel.
So I got to thinking if time travel into the future is possible then that would mean time isn't a paradox mankind made up and it is physical. Not sure if the formula is even any where right but this is what...