Recent content by sanpkl

Does the (assumption of) ubiquitousness of EM fields explain single particle interference well/better? Below is a rough logic, however it maybe need modifications. The double slit or the mach-zehnder or any object changes the configuration of time-space and EM fields. The photon may not know...

I am not clear on the below, so any additional information would also be good. Let's say a pair of photons is entangled on 2 properties. When we measure on property A -- the values for property A (for both the entangled photons) becomes determinate/locked/fixed when we measure on property B...

The below is very amateurish, so please correct/modify where needed. Just curious to know the technicalities i.e. how experiments, involving entanglement, are conducted - from a technical perspective For example - Let's take the Bell's tests Entangled pairs would/could be created via SPCD...

1. A photon does not experience time, does a photon experience space? (between interactions?) 2. When photon is bound between electron orbital levels it is "stuck" there and hence experiences time? When an electron jumps to a lower orbital it will emit a photon, this photon would then move at...

no, not a student. nor is it being posted for any friend or relative

During entanglement photons get into an indeterminate state. The outcome of the photon state, on measurement, would now be random. Does this mean that, some of the, information the striking photon was carrying prior to transferring its energy to two entangled photons irretrievably lost? Even...

1 what are the various methods/ways, besides quantum entanglement, to put, some of, the photon properties an indeterminate state? 2 what are the various methods/ways, besides polarizers or measurement, to put the photon properties a determinate state?

I got the Bell's theorem, once again. And this time in a easier, to retain, way. I can now check it off my to do list. ...;) Thanks Nugatory.

Why can an LB not be a LLe? It is because Alice/Bob have already measured as LW and BLe?

from the post below we get: LB > LW + BLe L - left handed B - brown W - wool Le - leather from the viewpoint of classical mechanics - why is the above equation inconsistent with it's understanding of reality? or prediction You cannot change the polarization to your choice. Also you don't...

I have been getting conflicting information so here are my questions, re: 1. Single photon interference 2. Interference between two photons 3. Two-photon interference 1. Some literature says that only single photon/particle interference exists. Can two photons interfere with each other? 2...

perhaps there is a "dimension" in addition to time-space, through which quantum mechanics operates? the "probability wave function" operates in that dimension. when we try to measure a photon's position, the wave function collapses, the photon moves back into the time-space dimension

thanks eagle... from the walborn cunha paper... they write.. thanks eagle...the above confirms/reassures what i said per my understanding of the experiment ...past cannot be changed... however, in this particular paper/page, they left out the second point...it seems i.e. the...

Dr Chinese i am reading the paper you sent..will get back in 2 days... yes, good point. agreed. look forward to your comments on the below: however half of the experiment is done when signal photon strikes D0? At that moment in time the signal photon has made it's...

Entanglement Hypothesis Hypothesis (just a hypothesis): Entanglement of the photons (say signal and idler) happens outside space and time. Thus some of their "properties" are really not separated by space and time. Every particle (mass/energy) has waves associated with it. In case of...