- #106
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 24,775
- 792
Thomas Thiemann's landmark LQG survey
I think he did a good job. AFAICS.
Lubos Motl immediately attacked him with resounding snorts of contempt. hee hee.
Hans Kastrup, a mentor to both Thiemann and Bojowald, had been urging Thomas to write a reply and rebuttal to Herman Nicolai's "Outsider View" paper. So Thiemann called this an "inside" view.
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0608210
Loop Quantum Gravity: An Inside View
Thomas Thiemann
58 pages
Report-no: AEI-2006-066
"This is a (relatively) non -- technical summary of the status of the quantum dynamics in Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). We explain in detail the historical evolution of the subject and why the results obtained so far are non -- trivial. The present text can be viewed in part as a response to an article by Nicolai, Peeters and Zamaklar [hep-th/0501114]. We also explain why certain no go conclusions drawn from a mathematically correct calculation in a recent paper by Helling et al [hep-th/0409182] are physically incorrect."
I think he did a good job. AFAICS.
Lubos Motl immediately attacked him with resounding snorts of contempt. hee hee.
Hans Kastrup, a mentor to both Thiemann and Bojowald, had been urging Thomas to write a reply and rebuttal to Herman Nicolai's "Outsider View" paper. So Thiemann called this an "inside" view.
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0608210
Loop Quantum Gravity: An Inside View
Thomas Thiemann
58 pages
Report-no: AEI-2006-066
"This is a (relatively) non -- technical summary of the status of the quantum dynamics in Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). We explain in detail the historical evolution of the subject and why the results obtained so far are non -- trivial. The present text can be viewed in part as a response to an article by Nicolai, Peeters and Zamaklar [hep-th/0501114]. We also explain why certain no go conclusions drawn from a mathematically correct calculation in a recent paper by Helling et al [hep-th/0409182] are physically incorrect."
Last edited: