Resolving a Complex Identity: Collaborative Proof Approach

In summary, the LHS of this identity algebraically is resolved as follows: r = 4 pi r^3 P(r) + u, and the RHS is also resolved as r = 4 pi r^2 P(r) + u.
  • #1
Orion1
973
3


I am having difficulty symbolically resolving the LHS of this identity algebraically:

[itex]\frac{r}{2} \left[ \left(8 \pi P(r) + \frac{1}{r^2} \right) \frac{r}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{r^2} \right] = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex] \left(4 \pi r P(r) + \frac{1}{2r} \right) \frac{r}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{2r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex] \left( 4 \pi r^2 P(r) + \frac{1}{2} \right) \frac{1}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{2r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{4 \pi r^2 P(r)}{r-2 u}+\frac{1}{2 (r-2 u)}-\frac{1}{2 r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

Any collaboration would be greatly appreciated.

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

Attempt to resolve LHS with RHS:
[itex]\frac{4 \pi r^2 P(r)}{r-2 u}+\frac{1}{2 (r-2 u)}-\frac{1}{2 r} = \frac{4 \pi r^2 P(r)}{r - 2u} + \frac{u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

Identity:
[itex]\frac{1}{2 (r-2 u)}-\frac{1}{2 r} = \frac{u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

Factor:
[itex]\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{1}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{r} \right) = \frac{u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]
[itex]u = \frac{r(r - 2u)}{2} \left( \frac{1}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{r} \right)[/itex]
[itex]\frac{1}{2} [r - (r - 2u )] = u[/itex]
[itex] u = u [/itex]

Resigned.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Orion1 said:


I am having difficulty symbolically resolving the LHS of this identity algebraically:

[itex]\frac{r}{2} \left[ \left(8 \pi P(r) + \frac{1}{r^2} \right) \frac{r}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{r^2} \right] = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex] \left(4 \pi r P(r) + \frac{1}{2r} \right) \frac{r}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{2r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex] \left( 4 \pi r^2 P(r) + \frac{1}{2} \right) \frac{1}{r - 2u} - \frac{1}{2r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{4 \pi r^2 P(r)}{r-2 u}+\frac{1}{2 (r-2 u)}-\frac{1}{2 r} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

Any collaboration would be greatly appreciated.


Put the left-hand side over a common denominator. You're nearly there!
 
  • #4
Orion1 said:

Attempt to resolve LHS with RHS:
...
Identity:
...
Factor:
...
Resigned.

Why resign? In the domain where your steps were reversible, doesn't reversing your steps do exactly what you want?
 
  • #5

LHS over common denomonator:
[itex]\frac{8 \pi r^3 P(r)}{2r (r-2 u)}+\frac{r}{2r (r - 2 u)}-\frac{r - 2u}{2 r(r - 2u)} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{8 \pi r^3 P(r) + r - (r - 2u)}{2 r(r - 2u)} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{8 \pi r^3 P(r) + 2 u}{2 r (r-2 u)} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}[/itex]

[itex]\boxed{\frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)} = \frac{4 \pi r^3 P(r) + u}{r(r - 2u)}}[/itex]


Hurkyl said:
doesn't reversing your steps do exactly what you want?


Affirmative, there was nothing left to prove at that point, hence resign. However the LHS common denominator proof approach is what I was searching for.

Thanks johnshade, you just helped me solve a PHD level equation!
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Resolving a Complex Identity: Collaborative Proof Approach

What is symbolic proof of identity?

Symbolic proof of identity is a method used in mathematics and computer science to prove that two expressions or equations are equivalent. It involves using symbols and logical steps to demonstrate that both sides of the equation are equal.

Why is symbolic proof of identity important?

Symbolic proof of identity is important because it allows us to verify the correctness of mathematical or computer-based models. It also helps in developing new theories and understanding the relationships between different mathematical concepts.

What are some common techniques used in symbolic proof of identity?

Some common techniques used in symbolic proof of identity include algebraic manipulation, substitution, factoring, and the use of identities and properties of numbers and operations.

How is symbolic proof of identity different from numerical proof?

Symbolic proof of identity relies on symbols and logical steps to show the equivalence of two expressions, while numerical proof involves evaluating the expressions using specific numerical values. Symbolic proof is considered more rigorous and general, as it applies to all possible values of the variables.

Can symbolic proof of identity be used to solve real-world problems?

Yes, symbolic proof of identity can be applied to real-world problems in various fields, such as engineering, physics, and economics. It allows us to validate mathematical models and make predictions based on the relationships between different variables.

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
587
Replies
3
Views
990
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top