John Baez's comments on CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity.

  • Thread starter MTd2
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Gravity
In summary, this new paper by Sotiriou, Visser, and Weinfurtner discusses how Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity may be quantizing. It seems that Ambjorn and Loll will be at Zurich tonight to discuss it.
  • #1
MTd2
Gold Member
2,028
25
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3352208#post3352208

****************************

The abstract of the new Sotiriou-Visser-Weinfurtner paper sounds pretty explosive:

MTd2 said:
We explore the ultraviolet continuum regime of causal dynamical triangulations, as probed by the flow of the spectral dimension. We set up a framework in which one can find continuum theories that can fully reproduce the behaviour of the latter in this regime. In particular, we show that Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity can mimic the flow of the spectral dimension in causal dynamical triangulations to high accuracy and over a wide range of scales. This seems to indicate that the two theories lie in the same universality class.
Because causal dynamical triangulations slices up spacetime into surfaces of "constant time", I'd always worried that it was quantizing not general relativity but some other theory - one that has a built-in separation between time and space. Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity is such a theory. Wikipedia writes:

Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity (or Hořava gravity) is a theory of quantum gravity proposed by Petr Hořava in 2009. It solves the problem of different concepts of time in quantum field theory and general relativity by treating the quantum concept as the more fundamental so that space and time are not equivalent (anisotropic). The relativistic concept of time with its Lorentz invariance emerges at large distances. The theory relies on the theory of foliations to produce its causal structure. It is related to topologically massive gravity and the Cotton tensor. It is a possible UV completion of general relativity. The novelty of this approach, compared to previous approaches to quantum gravity such as Loop quantum gravity, is that it uses concepts from condensed matter physics such as quantum critical phenomena.

Hořava's initial formulation was found to have side-effects such as predicting very different results for a spherical Sun compared to a slightly non-spherical Sun, so others have modified the theory. Inconsistencies remain.
How are the causal dynamical triangulations people reacting to the work of Sotiriou, Visser, and Weinfurtner? Do they agree that they may be quantizing Hořava-Lifgarbagez gravity?

I haven't been paying attention to this stuff, but I may find out the answer to this question when I go to Zurich tonight. I guess both Ambjorn and Loll will be there.

By the way, your posts listing these abstracts serve as a nice quick way to catch up on recent work in quantum gravity. Thanks! I don't want to seem like I'm completely out of the loop.

Hmm, here's what Ambjorn and Loll say in their new review article:

What is curious about the phase structure of four-dimensional CDT quantum gravity is its resemblance with that of Horava-Lifgarbagez gravity [17], which has been spelled out further in [18,19]. It gives rise to the intriguing conjecture that there may be a universal phase diagram governing systems of higher-dimensional, dynamical geometry, and accomodating a variety of gravity theories, some of which may be anisotropic in space and time.

To someone raised on relativity it would seem a painful step to admit one is quantizing a theory where there really is a single "right" notion of time, and Lorentz transformations are just a kind of approximate symmetry, good at macroscopic scales. Maybe they hope they can get at quantum general relativity as one point in the phase diagram of Horava-Lifgarbagez theories.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Looks like there's lots of interesting stuff in Horava-Lifgarbagez still.

marcus has just listed a new paper from http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2131" about Horava-Lifgarbagez in his biblioraphy.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.0009" .

According to Visser, Horava-Lifgarbagez is still http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5587" .

Now, can someone tell me why http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.3094" working on AdS/CFT cite Gu and Wen?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3298" that draws a connection between noncritical strings in 2D and CDT...

Seems like everything's connected!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: John Baez's comments on CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity.

What is CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity?

CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity is a modified theory of gravity proposed by physicist Petr Hořava. It is based on the idea that space and time are not continuous, but rather discrete. This theory aims to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity by incorporating elements of both theories.

Who is John Baez and why are his comments on CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity significant?

John Baez is a prominent mathematician and mathematical physicist. He is known for his work in category theory, quantum gravity, and other areas of mathematics and physics. Baez's comments on CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity are significant because he has expertise in the relevant fields and his opinions are highly regarded within the scientific community.

What are some potential criticisms of CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity?

Some potential criticisms of CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity include the lack of experimental evidence to support the theory, the complexity of the mathematics involved, and the fact that it is still a relatively new and untested theory. Additionally, some critics argue that the theory may not fully resolve the conflicts between quantum mechanics and general relativity.

How does CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity differ from other theories of gravity?

CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity differs from other theories of gravity, such as Einstein's general relativity and string theory, in several ways. It incorporates elements of both quantum mechanics and general relativity, while other theories tend to focus on one or the other. Additionally, CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity proposes a discrete structure for space and time, whereas other theories assume a continuous structure.

Is CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity a widely accepted theory?

While CDT/Hořava-Lifshitz gravity has gained some attention and support within the scientific community, it is still considered a relatively new and untested theory. It has not yet been widely accepted as a mainstream theory of gravity, and more research and evidence are needed to fully understand its implications and validity.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top