- #1
melchisio
- 2
- 0
lab report--quickie!
im drawing up the graphs for my "centripetal force" lab report by hand, and we are instructed to use sig figs.
problem is, if i use sig figs and round my numbers, the graph's points are in a straight line with one other point that looks like an outlier. It isn't an outlier, and i know what the graph is supposed to look like... my points would follow that exact correlation if i extended the numbers one more digit.
Should i keep my figures rounded, however messed up my graph looks, or should i just leave it and explain the "lack of" trend in my conclusion??
HELP SOON!
im drawing up the graphs for my "centripetal force" lab report by hand, and we are instructed to use sig figs.
problem is, if i use sig figs and round my numbers, the graph's points are in a straight line with one other point that looks like an outlier. It isn't an outlier, and i know what the graph is supposed to look like... my points would follow that exact correlation if i extended the numbers one more digit.
Should i keep my figures rounded, however messed up my graph looks, or should i just leave it and explain the "lack of" trend in my conclusion??
HELP SOON!