- #1
- 7,255
- 66
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3825610222960975525&pr=goog-sl"
Last edited by a moderator:
It certainly was after they dumped the Na into it.Mallignamius said:It was devoid of fish, or so said the narrator.
Astronuc said:It certainly was after they dumped the Na into it.
Astronuc said:It certainly was after they dumped the Na into it.
Why they just didn't park it at the Hanford Reservation or Idaho, I don't know. Add to the list of stupid things that government does.
Basically it would dissolve the flesh away from the skeleton.Mallignamius said:Well, if it did have an animal population, what would the result be after the sodium dump?
What I mean is, would there be some far-reaching effects to the animals both in and around the lake?Astronuc said:Basically it would dissolve the flesh away from the skeleton.
Mallignamius said:What I mean is, would there be some far-reaching effects to the animals both in and around the lake?
cyrusabdollahi said:Thats a huge lake, and considering that most of the sodium burned, my guess is no. Actually, you could probably find out by seeing if lake lenore has any 'sodium contamination'
http://www.thelake.org/gallery.htmlLenore used to feed water into Soap Lake from the north before the irrigation system was built and Lake Lenore was freshened and diluted. Lenore, once as mineralized as the upper layer Soap Lake is today, now is relatively fresh and supports sport fishing.
http://www.fisheyesoup.com/article_details/132.htmlPictured are Lahontan Cutthroat caught and released from an Eastern Washington alkali lake, called Lake Lenore. For their size Lahontans don't seem to fight as hard as Rainbows or Browns, but what they lack in zip, they make up for, in beauty.
Lake Lenore, near the town of Soap Lake, is producing Lahontan cutthroats of 6 pounds or more.
Astronuc said:The rationale behind dumping it was also very stupid - "because a public (common) carrier wouldn't accept it for transport'. So why didn't the military transport it, or contact one on many chemical companies, one of whom probably made the material?
I just don't buy it. Monsanto, Dupont, Dow, Union Carbide, . . . . and so on, transported lots of hazardous materials.
How did the military get it in the first place?
http://www.ufomind.com/area51/articles/1996/wsj_960208.html...Although the plaintiffs concede Area 51 harbors military secrets that must be protected, Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor who represents the plaintiffs and more than two dozen other Area 51 employees who so far haven't joined in the suit, says the government's position is too extreme.
''The government claims that revealing any information about Area 51 would jeopardize American lives,'' he says. ''The only American lives lost so far are those of their own workers.''
...During the 1980s, the men say, classified materials were burned at least once a week in 100-yard-long, 25-foot-wide pits. With security guards standing at the edge, Air Force personnel threw in hazardous chemicals such as methylethylketone, a common cleaning solvent, and other things, such as computers, that produce dioxin when burned. The toxic brew, including drums of hazardous waste trucked in from defense facilities in other states, was ignited with jet fuel and typically burned for eight to 12 hours, the men say. [continued]
Area = 1670 acres, avg depth = 20ft => volume of water ~ 40 billion literscyrusabdollahi said:how many millions of gallons of water in that lake?
Lenore used to feed water into Soap Lake from the north before the irrigation system was built and Lake Lenore was freshened and diluted. Lenore, once as mineralized as the upper layer Soap Lake is today, now is relatively fresh and supports sport fishing.
cshum00 said:The question lies on where all that Na came from? How did they get so much Na? Also how can that much of Na be recycled and used again?
Where is all that Chloride coming from to form the NaCl?Integral said:A significant portion of the recoved material could well be common table salt.
mrjeffy321 said:Where is all that Chloride coming from to form the NaCl?
I would think it would be much more likely for the Na to form NaOH in solution with the lake water. Then, over a long time, the lake water could absorb Carbon Dioxide from the air and slowly neutralize the NaOH by forming Sodium Bicarbonate, which is much less soluble than NaCl and would precipitate out of solution more easily.
The again, you could very well have some soluble Chloride salt in the water already which could easily form a very insoluble Hydroxide salt, thereby leaving the NaCl behind in solution, but making it slightly harder to recover.
The best way to store 20,000lbs of Na would be in a dry, airtight container to prevent any reactions with moisture in the air. It is also important to store it away from any sources of heat or open flames.
Yes, 20,000lbs of Na can be safely transported as long as it is properly packaged and labeled. It is important to follow all safety regulations and guidelines for transporting hazardous materials.
Handling 20,000lbs of Na can be hazardous due to its highly reactive nature. It can react violently with water, acids, and other chemicals, potentially causing fires or explosions. It can also release toxic fumes when in contact with moisture.
The safest way to dispose of 20,000lbs of Na would be to contact a hazardous waste disposal company. They have the proper equipment and expertise to handle and dispose of the substance safely.
Some potential uses for 20,000lbs of Na include manufacturing of soaps and detergents, water softening, and production of certain chemicals. It can also be used in the production of sodium metal, which is used in various industries such as aerospace and electronics.