Is Your Pet's Food Safe? A Look at Recent Recalls and Alternatives

In summary: There is controversy over the ethics of animal testing, with some believing that it is necessary to develop new drugs and treatments, while others argue that the pain and suffering inflicted on the animals is unnecessary and cruel.
  • #1
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
8,143
1,761
ALBANY, New York (AP) -- Rat poison has been found in pet food blamed for the deaths of at least 16 cats and dogs, a spokeswoman for the State Department of Agriculture and Markets said Friday.

The toxin was identified as aminopterin, state Agriculture Commissioner Patrick Hooker said in a statement. Aminopterin is used to kill rats in some countries but is not registered for that use in the United States, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

The officials did not say how they believed it got into the pet food. [continued]
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/23/pet.food.recall.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sounds like it might be a disgruntled employee getting revenge on the company.
 
  • #3
Thanks for posting that, Ivan.
 
  • #4
You bet.

We have bought some Priorety brand for little buddy a few times, and the other cats probably ate some, so we've been watching our cats very closely. They all seem to be okay.
 
  • #5
Its a small world

A source close to the investigation tells ABC News that the rodenticide, which the source says is illegal to use in the United States, was on wheat that was imported from China and used by Menu Foods in nearly 100 brands of dog and cat food," the network says on its website.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/03/abc_news_rat_po.html

Kinda makes me wonder where else that wheat ended up.

I don't think people will be get any satisfaction by filing law suits. I could be wrong but as far as I know pets are considered to be property. People could only recover the cost of the pet.::mad:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
It was Cornell, not the Department of Agriculture that discoverd the toxin.

The toxin, identified in samples of pet food tested at Cornell University, is aminopterin, a derivative of folic acid, the department said. The substance is not approved for use in the United States.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/23/us/23cnd-petfood.html?hp

I am also thinking that the pet food industry is unregulated.

Edit: It is unregulated. This article from 2003 doesn't paint a rosy picture of the pet food industry.

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/petfood2.html
 
Last edited:
  • #7
edward said:
It was Cornell, not the Department of Agriculture that discoverd the toxin.



http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/23/us/23cnd-petfood.html?hp

I am also thinking that the pet food industry is unregulated.

Edit: It is unregulated. This article from 2003 doesn't paint a rosy picture of the pet food industry.

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/petfood2.html

Man, that's pretty bad.

I guess feeding your pets leftovers and such is the best thing.
 
  • #8
edward said:
Its a small world



http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/03/abc_news_rat_po.html
Thanks...that answered the question I had after reading the article Ivan posted, which was whether the wheat gluten was from a domestic or imported source if the poison is not supposed to be used in the U.S.

Kinda makes me wonder where else that wheat ended up.

Yes, I'm also wondering this. Did they only use it for animal foods, or did it also make it into the human supply chain? Wheat gluten is such a commonly used product that I'd suspect they don't only sell it for pet foods.

At least now they've traced the source and the contaminant, so that will make it easier to trace where else it has been distributed and guarantee that everything that might be contaminated is pulled from the supply chain.

I don't think people will be get any satisfaction by filing law suits. I could be wrong but as far as I know pets are considered to be property. People could only recover the cost of the pet.
They can also potentially recover the cost of any veterinary care required as a result of eating the contaminated food. Monetary settlements only help pay the bills acquired, but never make up for the emotional loss. I don't know how international law works, and if Menu Foods can do anything to sue the supplier for all their business losses and the damage to the brand's reputation, but I hope they can. And maybe they'll learn to stick to domestic sources for food products, or at least not use foreign sources when they don't have to follow the same safety requirements we do domestically!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
edward said:
Edit: It is unregulated. This article from 2003 doesn't paint a rosy picture of the pet food industry.

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/petfood2.html

That site is flat out lying to promote an anti-animal testing agenda. The industry is regulated, by the FDA (primary agency charged with oversight for pet food safety), USDA, and FTC.

http://www.fda.gov/cvm/petfoodflier.html

http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?cls=2&cat=1661&articleid=2645
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Moonbear said:
The industry is regulated, by the FDA (primary agency charged with oversight for pet food safety), USDA, and FTC.
Well it appears they are not doing a good job.

And what about the US customs, are they doing any testing on food imports from china? They are half paranoid when a traveler brings a thing like an apple into the US from China, but it seems that rat poison in food is not tested.

And animal testing ought to be exposed, people at least should know what scientists are doing to animals in the name of science.
 
  • #11
MeJennifer said:
And animal testing ought to be exposed, people at least should know what scientists are doing to animals in the name of science.

No, they shouldn't know what happens to animals, since they would only get frustrated because there is nothing to do about it.
 
  • #12
MeJennifer said:
Well it appears they are not doing a good job.
Why not? They have recalled all the food in question and found the source and the reason for the problem. They have done just as good of a job for pets as they have for all the other human foods recalled this year and late last year. In fact, it seems a better job has been done, because only about a week after the recall, we have an answer, unlike the months it took for anyone to find out why people were getting sick from spinach.

And what about the US customs, are they doing any testing on food imports from china? They are half paranoid when a traveler brings a thing like an apple into the US from China, but it seems that rat poison in food is not tested.
I can't speak for what Customs is doing.

And animal testing ought to be exposed, people at least should know what scientists are doing to animals in the name of science.
Yes, but do they know enough about the science to even understand what they are being told? Do you want to know what animal testing at a pet food company consists of? It consists of feeding the animals. If you want the real story, ask us scientists, because we will gladly explain because we have nothing to hide. If you want lies and fear, ask the sort of people who create the site that was originally linked, because that's what it provides.
 
  • #13
Moonbear, you can probably shed some light on this.

"ABC News first reported that the rodenticide may have been present in the wheat that was imported from China and used by Menu Foods, according to a source close to the investigation.

Some Vets Remain Skeptical

Some veterinary experts say they are still skeptical as to whether the chemical is responsible for the kidney damage the pets endured.

"With the information that we have, none of us feel that this product fits the lesions we are seeing, but there may be information we don't know yet," said Lawrence McGill, a veterinary pathologist in Salt Lake City. "The feeling is that there are more questions than answers with this product."

"Renal failure is not the expected response to these drugs," said Susan Weinstein, executive director of the Massachusetts Veterinary Medical Association. She added that most rodent poisons work as severe anticoagulants — meaning they cause the rats that ingest them to bleed to death.

"Whether this particular toxin in this case can create renal failure depends on how this drug works in the body, which may be an entirely different pathway than the anticoagulants," Weinstein said. "Because we aren't yet familiar with this toxin, we can't be confident of the causation link."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=2975912
 
  • #14
radou said:
No, they shouldn't know what happens to animals, since they would only get frustrated because there is nothing to do about it.
So you are advocating censorship?

Moonbear said:
If you want the real story, ask us scientists, because we will gladly explain because we have nothing to hide.
So what are you saying that the are no scientists who perform tests that harm animals?
 
  • #15
My best friend found her cat laying on its back, with its tongue hanging out. She didn't want the kids to see it, so she got a black plastic bag, and started putting the cat in it.
She said the cat started hissing and biteing her. This also alarmed her! So she put it in the cat carrier and dashed off to the vet. She told the vet all that had happened, and asked if it was a sign of renal failure.
The vet said...no, it was a sign of putting a sleeping cat into a black plastic bag.:smile:
 
  • #16
Moonbear said:
That site is flat out lying to promote an anti-animal testing agenda. The industry is regulated, by the FDA (primary agency charged with oversight for pet food safety), USDA, and FTC.

http://www.fda.gov/cvm/petfoodflier.html

http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?cls=2&cat=1661&articleid=2645

I can't seem to find any links that outright recommend the safety of the pet food industry. Canada seems to be totally unregulated.

III. The Current Regulatory Structure

Several different groups at various levels of authority regulate pet food. Pet food is regulated by the FDA at the federal level under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. More specifically, within the FDA, the Center for Veterinary Medicine regulates “animal drugs, animal feeds, food additives and ingredients.” A non-governmental organization, the Association of American Feed Control Officials, sets nutritional standards, label requirements, and feeding trial protocols for pet foods. Additionally, each state may have its own animal feed regulatory agency which regulate pet foods sold or manufactured within their state.[25] The Pet Food Institute, a trade group representing 97% of the U.S. pet food manufacturers, serves as the “voice” of the industry to Congress, state and federal agencies.[26] With so many different groups regulating what goes into your animal’s mouth, one would assume that commercial foods are safe. How ironic then, that this over-regulation often results in misinformed owners with malnourished pets.

http://leda.law.harvard.edu/leda/data/784/Patrick06.html

This tends to indicate self regulation more than anything. This is not unusual with Federal and state agencies. The EPA allows voluntary "self reporting" of toxic levels of beryllium at a local Tucson facility.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
hypatia said:
My best friend found her cat laying on its back, with its tongue hanging out. She didn't want the kids to see it, so she got a black plastic bag, and started putting the cat in it.
She said the cat started hissing and biteing her. This also alarmed her! So she put it in the cat carrier and dashed off to the vet. She told the vet all that had happened, and asked if it was a sign of renal failure.
The vet said...no, it was a sign of putting a sleeping cat into a black plastic bag.:smile:
:smile: :smile: Glad the kitty was ok.
 
  • #18
MeJennifer said:
And animal testing ought to be exposed, people at least should know what scientists are doing to animals in the name of science.
Not saying the experiments are ok, but the public - any public- is an idiot.
 
  • #19
MeJennifer said:
So you are advocating censorship?

In a way. But the thing I'm really advocating is the fact that I don't give a damn about it. Call me ignorant, but at least I'm sincere. :smile:
 
  • #20
hypatia said:
My best friend found her cat laying on its back, with its tongue hanging out. She didn't want the kids to see it, so she got a black plastic bag, and started putting the cat in it.
She said the cat started hissing and biteing her. This also alarmed her! So she put it in the cat carrier and dashed off to the vet. She told the vet all that had happened, and asked if it was a sign of renal failure.
The vet said...no, it was a sign of putting a sleeping cat into a black plastic bag.:smile:

:smile: :smile: :smile: That one gets added to my store of favorite quotes and stories. That's funny! And if I were her husband, I would be sleeping with one eye open. :biggrin:
 
  • #21
radou said:
In a way. But the thing I'm really advocating is the fact that I don't give a damn about it. Call me ignorant, but at least I'm sincere. :smile:

I care very much, and I do want to know. Especially if my tax dollars are paying for it.
I'm not a militant animal rights person, but I do want to know that those who oversee animal research practices are enforcing the set standards.
 
  • #22
I care about where all of that blasted Chinese wheat gluten came from and went to. Noodles anyone?

BTW if anyone needs any Chinese wheat gluten here is where to go. As you can see it has only 10 PPM heavy metals.:rolleyes:

Wheat Gluten (3/19/2007)
we offer food and feed grade wheat gluten as: protein 75% ash 2% 3% water 8% 9% heavy metals 10ppm.

See All Leads (42), Catalogs from Qingdao Terio Corp. [China]

http://www.ecplaza.net/ecmarket/list.asp?cmd=search&keywords=wheat+gluten

Bizarre just totally bizarre.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
The recall may be expanded to include Iams dry cat food. Also, Tsu thought that she heard that Hill's Science Diet is included, but I haven't seen that reported. If anyone does please post right away.

The focus has changed to melamine contamination

RICHMOND, Va. -- Government testing of recalled pet food linked to dog and cat deaths has found a chemical used to make plastics.

The Food and Drug Administration said it found melamine in samples of the Menu Foods pet food, as well as in wheat gluten used as an ingredient.

...Cornell University scientists also have found the chemical, also used as a fertilizer, in the urine and kidney of a sick cat.[continued with videos of latest]
http://www.wjactv.com/mostpopular/11454230/detail.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
CNN reports that Hill's Prescription Diet, M/D, is included in the recall.
 
  • #25
I work in a vet lab, running about 6-700 samples per day. Volume is up easily 30% over the last couple weeks. It seems ever other sample says "was fed tainted food, owner concerned, no clinical signs"

I don't think we've had any actual sick animals from this.
 
  • #26
Ivan Seeking said:
CNN reports that Hill's Prescription Diet, M/D, is included in the recall.

Along with all of these in the link.

http://www.hillspet.com/menu_foods/Menu_Foods_en_US.htm

Iams

http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070330/BREAKING/70330009

All Purina foods in the foil pouches were recalled, but I see they are back on the shelves agian.
 
  • #27
One thing that I never saw in any of the early news reports was that the problem with menu foods was discovered while they were doing their own taste tests of the products.

This all began because when Menu Foods was performing routine taste tests on its latest shipments. Twenty-five cats and fifteen dogs participated in the tests; nine of the cats died. In the wake of the recall, one dog and four more cats have died. The food seems to cause kidney damage, and cats are particularly vulnerable to that sort of thing. Menu Foods believes the problem is in the wheat gluten they used, but at this point it's all conjecture.

http://www.conservativecat.com/mt/archives/2007/03/about_the_menu.html

Now that the FDA is actually looking they found the melamine.
 
  • #28
Could be worse :eek:
57 Diners Poisoned
Updated: 15:03, Friday March 30, 2007

Fifty-seven people are being treated in hospital after eating food containing rat poison at a restaurant in China.

Police are investigating the incident at the family business in Zhejiang province's Yongkang city, the official Xinhua News Agency said.

They said a number of children were among those in hospital.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1258423,00.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #29
Art said:
Could be worse :eek: http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1258423,00.html

It is getting worse for pets, plus the FDA still doesn't know where all of the Chinese wheat gluten went to.

New products have been added to the recall list. Purina's Alpo prime cuts in gravy.

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/11469541/detail.html

Also Delmonte has added a number of products including doggie treats listed in the link below.

http://home.businesswire.com/portal...d=news_view&newsId=20070331005023&newsLang=en
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #30
I think at this point it would be good to come up with a list that is known to be safe. Hills, Purina and Delmonte have recalls of their own which were not listed in the original Menu recall. Despite the fact that the above recalls are recent. Menu claims all of it's foods are now safe?
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Is Your Pet's Food Safe? A Look at Recent Recalls and Alternatives

What are some recent pet food recalls and why were they issued?

Some recent pet food recalls include the 2019 recall of Hill's Pet Nutrition canned dog food due to elevated levels of vitamin D, the 2020 recall of certain Sportmix pet foods due to potentially fatal levels of aflatoxin, and the 2021 recall of certain Sunshine Mills pet foods due to potential salmonella contamination. These recalls were issued to protect pets and their owners from potential health hazards.

How can I ensure my pet's food is safe?

To ensure your pet's food is safe, it is important to research the brand and company that produces the food. Look for companies that have a good track record of quality control and safety measures. Additionally, pay attention to any recalls and avoid purchasing products that have been recalled. You can also consult with your veterinarian for recommendations on safe and healthy pet food options.

Are there any alternative options to store-bought pet food?

Yes, there are alternative options to store-bought pet food such as homemade diets, raw diets, and freeze-dried or dehydrated diets. These options may require more preparation and research, but they can provide a more personalized and potentially safer diet for your pet. It is important to consult with a veterinarian or animal nutritionist before making any significant changes to your pet's diet.

How can I stay updated on pet food recalls?

You can stay updated on pet food recalls by regularly checking the FDA's website for pet food recalls and signing up for email alerts. You can also follow pet food companies and organizations on social media for any updates or announcements. Additionally, staying informed about any potential health concerns or issues with certain ingredients can help you make informed decisions about your pet's food.

What should I do if my pet's food has been recalled?

If your pet's food has been recalled, stop feeding it to your pet immediately. You can return the product to the store for a refund or dispose of it properly. If your pet has consumed the recalled food, monitor them for any signs of illness and consult with your veterinarian if necessary. It is also important to report the issue to the FDA and the pet food company to help prevent further incidents.

Similar threads

Back
Top