- #1
Andre
- 4,311
- 74
We have seen http://home.earthlink.net/~ponderthemaundercf/id12.html, she has decided that:
and moreover:
However, let's have a look at the http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=6245 .
Like Kristen, it has also a scope of work.
First a little vitriol also aimed at Kristen to poison the well, but at least finally finally, they promise proof or an accurately representation of the scientific evidence of climate change.
But please go over the six arguments and help me to find that evidence.
http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=6229
After reviewing numerous scientific studies and observing data, it is clear that the theory that “man made increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide are causing global warming” is not likely.
and moreover:
This report is a comprehensive look at the global warming issue without financial or political bias. It uses the most updated information provided by scientists and researchers and interjects common sense, an important component missing from the global warming debate.
However, let's have a look at the http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=6245 .
Like Kristen, it has also a scope of work.
Those who seek to distort and undermine the science of climate change and deny the seriousness of the potential consequences of global warming put forward a range of arguments most of which misrepresent the existing research. It is vital that the scientific evidence on climate change is accurately represented.
First a little vitriol also aimed at Kristen to poison the well, but at least finally finally, they promise proof or an accurately representation of the scientific evidence of climate change.
But please go over the six arguments and help me to find that evidence.
http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=6229
Last edited by a moderator: