How do you solve this integral using the classic mistake method?

  • Thread starter Alexx1
  • Start date
In summary, we are trying to prove that for all n \in \mathbb{N} and n \geq 2, the integral \int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^n} can be expressed as \frac{1}{2(n-1)}\cdot\frac{x}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}} - \frac{2n-3}{2(n-1)}\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}. This can be proven using proof by induction and integration by parts for the induction step. By expanding the expression for In-1 and manipulating it, we can achieve the desired form. It is important to
  • #1
Alexx1
86
0
In = Integral(1/((1+x2)n)dx

For all n ∈ Natural numbers (exclusively 0), n≠1: In = 1/(2(n-1)) * x/((1+x2)n-1) + (2n-3)/(2(n-1))*In-1

Can someone prove this?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Use proof by induction on n, using integration by parts for the induction step.
 
  • #3
HallsofIvy said:
Use proof by induction on n, using integration by parts for the induction step.

I've tried it with that methode..
But what do you choose as u and dv?

I've tried it with: u=(1/((1+x2)n) ==> du= (-2nx)/((1+x2)n+1) and dv= 1 ==> v=x

==> x/(1+x2)n + 2n Integral(x^2/((1+x^2)^(n+1)))

How do you integrate: (x^2/((1+x^2)^(n+1)) ?
 
  • #4
Let me rewrite your problem in TeX. Prove for all [itex]n \in \mathbb{N}[/itex] and [itex]n \geq 2[/itex] that

[tex]
\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^n} \;=\; \frac{1}{2(n-1)}\cdot\frac{x}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
\;\;-\;\; \frac{2n-3}{2(n-1)}\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
[/tex]

You've noticed that using integration by parts on In gives you an integral with a power of n+1 in the denominator, which you can't simplify. Instead, try expanding In-1 and working with that expression.
 
  • #5
Tedjn said:
Let me rewrite your problem in TeX. Prove for all [itex]n \in \mathbb{N}[/itex] and [itex]n \geq 2[/itex] that

[tex]
\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^n} \;=\; \frac{1}{2(n-1)}\cdot\frac{x}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
\;\;-\;\; \frac{2n-3}{2(n-1)}\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
[/tex]

You've noticed that using integration by parts on In gives you an integral with a power of n+1 in the denominator, which you can't simplify. Instead, try expanding In-1 and working with that expression.

I don't know how to do that.. can you explain it to me?
 
  • #6
What does integration by parts on In-1 give you? The idea is that you might be able to manipulate it in some way to achieve the desired form, because all the terms turn out to be of the right form.
 
  • #7
Tedjn said:
What does integration by parts on In-1 give you? The idea is that you might be able to manipulate it in some way to achieve the desired form, because all the terms turn out to be of the right form.

I absolutely have no idea how to integrate it by parts on In-1..
 
  • #8
Alexx1 said:
I absolutely have no idea how to integrate it by parts on In-1..

Think what the expression means! You have n-1 instead of n, so what? n is any number you want anyway. Call it m if that makes it easier.
 
  • #9
Jame said:
Think what the expression means! You have n-1 instead of n, so what? n is any number you want anyway. Call it m if that makes it easier.

Is it like: xn-1 = xn*x-1 ?
 
  • #10
Alexx1 said:
Is it like: xn-1 = xn*x-1 ?
I know for sure that you are not as stupid as you're making yourself look right now, it's actually a classic mistake: to think the math is over your head and give up the logic and instead blindly follow what people tell you. Enough rant, sorry.

You have already been given the solution. Look
[tex]
\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^n} \;=\; \frac{1}{2(n-1)}\cdot\frac{x}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
\;\;-\;\; \frac{2n-3}{2(n-1)}\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
[/tex]

Put a big and fat parenthesis around [tex]\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}[/tex], or even write it separately. This is the exact same problem! Solve it again and you get an integral with n-2, again and you get n-3, and so on. Try setting n = 3 and do this two times to see the point.
 
  • #11
Jame said:
I know for sure that you are not as stupid as you're making yourself look right now, it's actually a classic mistake: to think the math is over your head and give up the logic and instead blindly follow what people tell you. Enough rant, sorry.

You have already been given the solution. Look
[tex]
\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^n} \;=\; \frac{1}{2(n-1)}\cdot\frac{x}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
\;\;-\;\; \frac{2n-3}{2(n-1)}\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
[/tex]

Put a big and fat parenthesis around [tex]\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}[/tex], or even write it separately. This is the exact same problem! Solve it again and you get an integral with n-2, again and you get n-3, and so on. Try setting n = 3 and do this two times to see the point.

I knew the answer in the beginning! The only thing I have to do is prove it!
Not proving it by filling in a random figure!
I have to solve integral In and the result must be [tex]
\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^n} \;=\; \frac{1}{2(n-1)}\cdot\frac{x}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
\;\;-\;\; \frac{2n-3}{2(n-1)}\int \frac{dx}{(1+x^2)^{n-1}}
[/tex]
 

FAQ: How do you solve this integral using the classic mistake method?

How do you prove a scientific hypothesis?

To prove a scientific hypothesis, you must conduct experiments and gather data to support or reject the hypothesis. This data should be analyzed and interpreted to draw conclusions about the validity of the hypothesis.

What is the importance of evidence in proving a scientific claim?

Evidence is crucial in proving a scientific claim because it provides support for the claim and helps to validate the results of experiments. Without evidence, a scientific claim is merely a hypothesis without any proof.

What is the role of peer review in proving scientific findings?

Peer review is an essential aspect of the scientific process as it involves other experts in the field reviewing and critiquing the methods and results of a study. This helps to ensure the validity and accuracy of the findings before they are accepted by the scientific community.

How do you ensure the reliability of your results in a scientific experiment?

To ensure the reliability of results, scientists must use proper experimental design, control groups, and repeat experiments multiple times to eliminate any potential sources of error. They must also accurately record and analyze data to minimize bias.

Can you ever truly prove something in science?

In science, you can never truly prove something beyond a shadow of a doubt. Instead, scientists strive to provide evidence and support for their claims through rigorous experimentation and analysis. This evidence can always be challenged or expanded upon by future research.

Back
Top