- #1
jhooper3581
- 49
- 0
Hmm... Who wins?
LOL thanks for the reply!cronxeh said:Beethoven. Most works of Mozart I find boring, boroquey, and classical. Beethoven on the other hand, is like Happy Hardcore vs Techno. It has a kick, a pizzazz, a vroom-vroom to your zoom-zoom
Lacy33 said:Beethoven is NOT for children under 52.
Lacy33 said:Not crazy about the way this poll was worded because Mozart is probably more "brilliant."
Pythagorean said:Mozart, but to be fair, Mozart's father was a musician (genetic influence) and a music teacher (learned influence). Despite that, Mozart was said to go above and beyond his father's teachings, even as a child.
Stratosphere said:Why must people continue to compare them? They were both great, it's just a matter of personal taste.
How was he more "Brilliant"? I'd like to know.
lisab said:Beethoven's grandfather was a musical director, and his father was a choir singer and music teacher.
Char. Limit said:Johann Sebastian Bach was better than both of them, I'm afraid.
The Toccata and Fugue in D Minor is one of the best pieces that have been ever made in my quite prideful opinion.
A couple of the musical composition majors, and a few other musicians I went to Oberlin with claimed this was not a particularly good fugue, that Bach wrote many very much better ones. I'm not in a position to judge, but it always struck me as weird that anyone would prefer a piece that was intellectually more interesting over one that sounded better.Char. Limit said:The Toccata and Fugue in D Minor is one of the best pieces that have been ever made in my quite prideful opinion.
Char. Limit said:Johann Sebastian Bach was better than both of them, I'm afraid.
The Toccata and Fugue in D Minor is one of the best pieces that have been ever made in my quite prideful opinion.
He had a music gene?Mozart's father was a musician (genetic influence)
Andre said:Hmm, from pure unrational enjoyment of the music, it seems that the dynamics of Mozart hardly span 6-9dB and has a tight rhythm causing some boredom to me after maybe 10-15 minutes despite the genial harmonic melody, while, Beethoven especially in his later works- creates genial suspense to me with the variation in the full dynamic range from a single instrument in pianissimo to the full orchestra in fortissimo and variation in rhythm which never stops intrueging.
zoobyshoe said:Mozart was certainly more brilliant; quite the prodigy, but I had to vote for Beethoven because I like his music better.
Chi Meson said:... But in spirit of the poll I will instead say:
"yes"
leroyjenkens said:I like Tchaikovsky. ...
Dembadon said:leroyjenkens said:I like Tchaikovsky.
He is not one of the choices. *grumble*
elect_eng said:Beethoven is the "Einstein" of music.
zoobyshoe said:No. Einstein was the Stravinsky of physics.
fourier jr said:nuff said
MotoH said:I have heard better music from a dead raccoon.
elect_eng said:Your comments say quite a bit about you and nothing meaningful about what you are talking about.
MotoH said:Beethoven was a little girl. He played piano like a deaf man.
Mozart on the other hand was the most BA piano player this side of the milky way.
zoobyshoe said:Troll. Confess! You're really a metal head and have no idea what anyone in this thread is talking about!