Nonconservation of axial charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter TriTertButoxy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axial Charge
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the nonconservation of axial charge due to quantum effects, specifically in relation to the electron and its mass. Participants inquire whether experiments have been conducted with parallel electric and magnetic fields to observe this anomalous effect, particularly in the context of pion decay and the eta-prime mass. It is noted that while classical experiments cannot demonstrate this non-conservation, quantum mechanical setups might be sensitive enough to detect it. The conversation also touches on the theoretical implications of the anomaly and the challenges of designing experiments that can measure the axial charge in electrons under specific conditions. Overall, the feasibility of observing this effect in pure QED remains an academic question of interest.
TriTertButoxy
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
It has been known that in addition to the electron mass, quantum effects anomalously break conservation of axial charge: \partial_\mu J^\mu_A = 2im\bar\psi\gamma_5\psi-\frac{g^2}{16\pi^2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\rho\sigma}.

Does anyone know if any experimenter has set up parallel E- and B- fields and observed this anomalous effect? If not, is it possible to observe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the pi0 decay for instance..
 
The eta-prime mass.

Usually the eta and the eta prime (together with the pions etc.) would both be Goldstone bosons for the whole chiral symmetry goup which is spontanenously broken in QCD. But as the axial symmetry is broken by an anomaly there is no Goldstone boson for this symmetry. Therefore the eta-prime mass is much higher as all other masses in this multiplet and especially as the eta mass: pion to eta masses from 135 MeV to 548 MeV; eta-prime has 959 MeV)
 
Yes, I know about the anomaly mediated decay of the pion. I was asking if anybody had set up the necessary external (electric and magnetic) fields to directly observe the non-conservation of axial charge for the electron.
 
This is not so easy. The non-conservation is a purely quantum mechanical effect. w/o quantum corrections the axial charge is conserved, so there are no "classical" experiments which would demonstrate its non-conservation.
 
tom.stoer said:
This is not so easy. The non-conservation is a purely quantum mechanical effect. w/o quantum corrections the axial charge is conserved, so there are no "classical" experiments which would demonstrate its non-conservation.

But, people have set up experiments to detect quantum mechanical interference patterns -- their equipment only needs to be sensitive enough. Isn't it, in principle, possible to set up an experiment that is sensitive to the quantum mechanical anomalous effect? I'm just wondering if anyone has tried this, or even contemplated this.
 
Isn't an isolated pion that creates (due to quantum fluctuations) its own decay mode photons w/o any additional experimental setup simple enough?

What does the anomaly say? It says that the current is not conserved, i.e.

\partial_\mu j^\mu_a = g^2C\,{}^\ast \! F_{\mu\nu}\,F^{\mu\nu}

Is you idea to set up an experiment with a certain electromagnetic field and measure the decay of the axial charge? I am not sure if this will work w/o taking quantum fluctuations into account. But if you need quantum fluctuations, then the pion in vacuum is certainly better as there is no need for external fields at all.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is enough to use the decay of the pion as confirmation for the anomalous non-conservation of the axial charge.

But my question is more academic: I want to see the anomalous effect in pure QED, involving the electronic axial current. (This is kind of like the academic question of electron-loop mediated photon-photon scattering, which induces non-linear terms in Maxwell's equations.) Is it possible to set up an experiment that can count the axial charge of a system of electrons, and see that it is anomalously non-conserved in the presence of parallel E and B fields?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K