- #1
johnsmi
- 31
- 0
Hi, I am reading this article for homework about a ring in a megnetic field. It starts off by giving a hamiltonian (an adiabatic part -never mind)
[tex]
H_{0}= \frac{1}{2M} [ \Pi -A]^{2} -\mu B( \phi) \cdot \sigma
[/tex]
A- is a known operator
where [tex] \Pi=\frac{1}{2a} \frac{d}{d \phi} -\frac{eB_{z} \pi a}{2c}[/tex] is the generalized momentum operator
I know that the eigen states of [tex]\mu B( \phi) \cdot \sigma [/tex] (Spinors) are:
[tex]
| \uparrow ( \phi) > =(i \alpha e^{-i \phi}[/tex] , [tex] -\beta)^{T}
[/tex]
[tex]
| \downarrow ( \phi) > =(i\beta e^{-i \phi}[/tex] , [tex] \alpha)^{T}
[/tex]
Now, in this article I have he sais that the eigen states of H0 can be written as
[tex]
| \uparrow ( \phi) > \otimes \psi ^{ \uparrow}_{n}[/tex] and
[tex]
| \downarrow ( \phi) > \otimes \psi ^{ \downarrow}_{n}
[/tex]
When, [tex] \psi \^{ \uparrow}_{n}[/tex] for example is the eigenstate of a Hamiltonian:
[tex]
H^{up}_{0}= \frac{1}{2M} [ \Pi -const]^{2} -\mu B
[/tex]
How did he get it (the last Hamiltonian)?
Someone told me to try and apply H0 on
[tex]
| \uparrow ( \phi) > \otimes \psi ^{ \uparrow}_{n} [/tex]
but I got something pretty awful
Can somone help me please?
[tex]
H_{0}= \frac{1}{2M} [ \Pi -A]^{2} -\mu B( \phi) \cdot \sigma
[/tex]
A- is a known operator
where [tex] \Pi=\frac{1}{2a} \frac{d}{d \phi} -\frac{eB_{z} \pi a}{2c}[/tex] is the generalized momentum operator
I know that the eigen states of [tex]\mu B( \phi) \cdot \sigma [/tex] (Spinors) are:
[tex]
| \uparrow ( \phi) > =(i \alpha e^{-i \phi}[/tex] , [tex] -\beta)^{T}
[/tex]
[tex]
| \downarrow ( \phi) > =(i\beta e^{-i \phi}[/tex] , [tex] \alpha)^{T}
[/tex]
Now, in this article I have he sais that the eigen states of H0 can be written as
[tex]
| \uparrow ( \phi) > \otimes \psi ^{ \uparrow}_{n}[/tex] and
[tex]
| \downarrow ( \phi) > \otimes \psi ^{ \downarrow}_{n}
[/tex]
When, [tex] \psi \^{ \uparrow}_{n}[/tex] for example is the eigenstate of a Hamiltonian:
[tex]
H^{up}_{0}= \frac{1}{2M} [ \Pi -const]^{2} -\mu B
[/tex]
How did he get it (the last Hamiltonian)?
Someone told me to try and apply H0 on
[tex]
| \uparrow ( \phi) > \otimes \psi ^{ \uparrow}_{n} [/tex]
but I got something pretty awful
Can somone help me please?
Last edited: