An exact expression for the fine structure constant

Click For Summary
The discussion presents an exact expression for the fine structure constant, stating that α^(-1/2) + α^(1/2)μ = e^(π^2/4), where α is approximately 1/137.03599911 and μ represents a term related to the electron's magnetic moment anomaly. Substituting the value of α leads to an approximation of π that closely matches its true value, differing only in the tenth digit. Additionally, using the exact value of π yields a refined fine structure constant of 1/137.03599952837, which falls within the measurement range. The significance of these findings remains uncertain, prompting curiosity about their implications. The discussion invites further exploration of potential meanings behind these mathematical relationships.
Hans de Vries
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
31
Just for the record:


\ \alpha^{-\frac{1}{2}}\ +\ \alpha^\frac{1}{2}\mu\ =\ e^{\pi^2/4}


Where \alpha, the fine-structure constant = 1/137.03599911 (46)
and \mu=1+\frac{\alpha}{2\pi} is Schwingers first term of the electrons
magnetic moment anomaly which is a function of \alpha as well.

\alpha^\frac{1}{2} is the probability for an electron to emit or absorb a photon.

Fill in 1/137.03599911 for \alpha and you'll get for pi:

3.14159265263 which only differs in the 10th digit with the real value:
3.14159265358...

Using the exact value for pi results in a value for the fine structure
constant of: 1/137.03599952837 which is within the measurement range.

Does it mean anything? maybe, maybe not.

Regards, Hans
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K