Semiclassical descriptions of atom-light interaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

Say I want to describe the interaction between a free atom atom and a classical EM field. The full Hamiltonian for the problem must be
<br /> H = (H_0 + p^2/2m) + (H_V + H_E) + H_D <br />
where H0 denotes the internal levels of the atom, HV the vacuum field, HE the energy density of the classical field and HD the dipole interaction.

My question is regarding HE. I have never seen it written explicitly and have not been able to find a reference where they do so. How would one write this? Is it QM-version of something similar to Poyntings vector?Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Hamiltonian for a classical drive is something along the line of

<br /> E(e^{-i\omega t}a^\dagger+e^{i \omega t} a)<br />

I would suggest you look up some info about the driven Jaynes-Cummings model
 
Last edited:
The usual form for the classical Hamiltonian for the electromagnetic field is the energy density, H = ½(E2 + B2). The easiest way to get to the quantum form is to use the radiation gauge, Φ = 0 and ∇·A = 0, allowing H to be written in terms of the vector potential as H = ½((A·)2 + (∇ x A)2).

Now Fourier transform, A = ∫d3k/√(2ω) ∑ε(k)[a(k)e-ik·x + a*eik·x], where ε(k) are polarization vectors. In terms of a(k) the Hamiltonian reduces to H = ∫d3k ω ∑a*(k)a(k). This is still classical.

Quantum mechanics comes in when you now say that a*(k)a(k) = ħ N(k) where N(k) is the number operator.
 
Ah, I see. Thanks for taking the time to explain that. I will study your reply in depth.

Best wishes,
Niles.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top