- #1
Andre
- 4,311
- 74
After the repeated debunking of Soon and Baliunas, Hans van Storch, and compared to multiple other reconstructions like Moberg that differ markedly enough from the hockeystick to consider it flawed, we thought we had buried it especially with the serious http://www.climate2003.com/pdfs/2004GL012750.pdf .
So whaddyaknow. a rigorous revival coming up? The replication of the hockeystick is http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2005/ammann.shtml. Were all the others wrong after all?
thriller or slapstick?
Last edited by a moderator: