'Intelligent Falling' Vs 'Gravity'…

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of Intelligent Falling, which proposes that a conscious intelligence governs all falling, in contrast to the secular explanation of gravity. Proponents of Intelligent Falling argue that this theory provides an elegant solution to the central problem of modern physics and urge for the merging of gravity-agenda scientists with Evangelical Physicists. The conversation also touches upon the idea of ascension being intelligent and the existence of a push force in the theory of gravitation.
  • #1
katlpablo
10
1
"… in Job 5:7, we read, 'But mankind is born to trouble, as surely as sparks fly upwards.' If gravity is pulling everything down, why do the sparks fly upwards with great surety? This clearly indicates that a conscious intelligence governs all falling."
http://theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4133&n=2

"Traditional scientists admit that they cannot explain how gravitation is supposed to work," Carson said. "What the gravity-agenda scientists need to realize is that 'gravity waves' and 'gravitons' are just secular words for 'God can do whatever He wants.'"
Some evangelical physicists propose that Intelligent Falling provides an elegant solution to the central problem of modern physics.
Gravity-agenda scientists are urged to merge with the Evangelical Physicists towards an unified force of physics which readers of the Bible have already known for millennia…


:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :eek: :bugeye: :cry: :-p :-p :zzz:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Everybody has heard of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, right?

http://www.venganza.org/index.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
you do know what kind of a website the onion is?
 
  • #4
According to the ECFR paper published[…] there are many phenomena that cannot be explained by secular gravity alone, including such mysteries as how angels fly, how Jesus ascended into Heaven, and how Satan fell when cast out of Paradise.
Proponents of 'Intelligent Falling' now seem to characterize Satan's "fall" as intelligent…! I wonder if ascension can be intelligent too…

'Intelligent Falling' as explained in the article shows that in that "theory" there undoubtedly exists a push force(as when God cast Satan out of Paradise) of 'gravity' that in the 'secular gravity' (as ECFR calls it) is rarely recognized. In the theory of gravitation the prevailing consensus seems to be that there is no such push force, but ONLY gravity's pull force, a conclusion that, to me, is not completely clear yet!
 
  • #5
inha said:
you do know what kind of a website the onion is?
Sincerely… no…
 

FAQ: 'Intelligent Falling' Vs 'Gravity'…

What is the difference between "Intelligent Falling" and "Gravity"?

"Intelligent Falling" is a pseudoscientific concept that suggests gravity is not the force responsible for objects falling, but rather a higher intelligence or "intelligent force". This idea is not supported by any scientific evidence and goes against the fundamental principles of physics. Gravity, on the other hand, is a well-established scientific concept that explains the attraction between objects with mass.

Who came up with the concept of "Intelligent Falling"?

The concept of "Intelligent Falling" was not proposed by a scientist or researcher, but rather by a satirical news website in 2005. The article was intended to poke fun at the creationism vs. evolution debate and was not meant to be taken seriously.

How does the theory of "Intelligent Falling" explain the motion of objects?

The theory of "Intelligent Falling" does not offer a scientific explanation for the motion of objects. It suggests that an intelligent force is responsible for objects falling, but it does not offer any evidence or explanation for how this force works or how it is different from gravity.

Is there any scientific evidence to support the concept of "Intelligent Falling"?

No, there is no scientific evidence to support the concept of "Intelligent Falling". In fact, all scientific evidence points to gravity as the force responsible for objects falling. The theory of gravity has been extensively studied and tested by scientists, and it is supported by numerous experiments and observations.

Why is the idea of "Intelligent Falling" considered pseudoscience?

The idea of "Intelligent Falling" is considered pseudoscience because it goes against established scientific principles and has no evidence to support it. Pseudoscience is any belief or practice that is presented as scientific but lacks scientific evidence, methodology, or plausibility.

Similar threads

Is Gravity Just Intelligent Falling?
Replies
14
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top