In theoretical physics, the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence, sometimes called Maldacena duality or gauge/gravity duality, is a conjectured relationship between two kinds of physical theories. On one side are anti-de Sitter spaces (AdS) which are used in theories of quantum gravity, formulated in terms of string theory or M-theory. On the other side of the correspondence are conformal field theories (CFT) which are quantum field theories, including theories similar to the Yang–Mills theories that describe elementary particles.
The duality represents a major advance in the understanding of string theory and quantum gravity. This is because it provides a non-perturbative formulation of string theory with certain boundary conditions and because it is the most successful realization of the holographic principle, an idea in quantum gravity originally proposed by Gerard 't Hooft and promoted by Leonard Susskind.
It also provides a powerful toolkit for studying strongly coupled quantum field theories. Much of the usefulness of the duality results from the fact that it is a strong-weak duality: when the fields of the quantum field theory are strongly interacting, the ones in the gravitational theory are weakly interacting and thus more mathematically tractable. This fact has been used to study many aspects of nuclear and condensed matter physics by translating problems in those subjects into more mathematically tractable problems in string theory.
The AdS/CFT correspondence was first proposed by Juan Maldacena in late 1997. Important aspects of the correspondence were soon elaborated in two articles, one by Steven Gubser, Igor Klebanov and Alexander Polyakov, and another by Edward Witten. By 2015, Maldacena's article had over 10,000 citations, becoming the most highly cited article in the field of high energy physics, reaching over 20,000 citations in 2020.
I have a question about Witten's original 1998 paper on AdS/CFT
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9802150
Since the AdS metric diverges at the boundary, the boundary metric is only defined up to a conformal class Eq. (2.2),
ds^2 \to d\widetilde{s}^2 = f^2 ds^2
Similarly, the solution for...
Hello everyone!
I'm studying string theory at a graduate level and want to focus on ADS/CFT correspondence. The problem is that I don't know where to start from.
I've already learned the bosonic string, some elements of CFT (and BRST quantization), T-duality and how the D-Branes enter the...
Hi!
I am a bit confused about the AdS/CFT conjecture...
One of the things I don't really understand is when N=4 SYM is a valid
description of the D-brane dynamics. My impression was this:
In the open string picture of branes, the massless excitations of the open string connected to the...
Hi, this is my first post. I've been studying the AdS/CFT
correspondance recently, and though I am familiar with the relativistic
calculations required, the aspects of the conformal field theory are
still new to me. Does anyone know a good primer for such material?
Namely, I am interested in...
I have a few questions about something I read in the http://pancake.uchicago.edu/~carroll/hawkingdublin.txt of Stephen Hawking's talk at GR17. He says that it has been claimed that the information paradox can be resolved by a duality between supergravity in anti de sitter (AdS) space and a...