Homework Statement
http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/5994/67110701dt0.png Homework Equations
A banach space is a complete normed space which means that every Cauchy sequence converges.
The Attempt at a Solution
I'm stuck at exercise (c).
Suppose (f_n)_n is a Cauchy sequence in E. Then...
I already know how to prove that if M is a compact metric space, then
C(M) = \{f\in \mathbb{C}^M\;|\; f\;\textrm{continuous}\}
with the sup-norm, is a Banach space, but now I encountered a claim, that actually metric is not necessary, and C(X) is Banach space also when X is a compact...
[SOLVED] Bijection between Banach spaces.
Homework Statement
Let E and F be two Banach space, f:E-->F be a continuous linear bijection and g:E-->F be linear and such that g\circ f^{-1} is continuous and ||g\circ f^{-1}||<1. Show that (f+g) is invertible and (f+g)^{-1} is continuous. [Hint...
I really don't understand nothing from the Banach fixed point theorem, i know that it should satisfy:
[g(x)-g(y)]<K(x-y) for all x and y in[a,b]
but i don't even understand what that's supposed to mean?
any help will be appreciated.
thank you.
Hi to all
What exactly is the difference between Banach(=complete, as far as I understand) (sub)space and closed (sub)space. Is there a normed vector space that is complete but not closed or normed vectore space that is closed but not complete?
Thanks in advance for explanation and/or examples.
[SOLVED] The continuous dual is Banach
Homework Statement
I'm trying to show that the continuous dual X' of a normed space X over K = R or C is complete.
The Attempt at a Solution
I have shown that if f_n is cauchy in X', then there is a functional f towards which f_n converge pointwise...
I've now encountered two different definitions for a projection.
Let X be a Banach space. An operator P on it is a projection if P^2=P.
Let H be a Hilbert space. An operator P on it is a projection if P^2=P and if P is self-adjoint.
But the Hilbert space is also a Banach space, and there's...
I'm trying to understand the Hahn Banach theorem, that every bounded linear functional f on some subspace M of a normed linear space X can be extended to a linear functional F on all of X with the same norm, and which agrees with f on M. But the proof is non-constructive, using zorn's lemma...
Let L(A;B) be the space of linear maps l:A\rightarrow B.
My goal is to derive the Leibniz (Product) Rule using the chain rule. Let f_i:U\subset E\rightarrow F_i, i=1,2 be differentiable maps and let B\in L(F_1,F_2;G). Then the mapping B(f_1,f_2)=B\circ (f_1\times f_2):U\subset E\rightarrow G...
Is the fact that a unit ball in an infinite-dimensional (Banach) space is a noncompact topological space...?
If it is, how would one go about proving it...?
Daniel.