If there are two symmetries of a Lagrangian, perhaps they are transformations, A and B, and they don't commute ##[A, B] \neq 0##. Let this act on some field, then if ##(BA) ^{-1}AB## does not return the original field, i.e. if ##(BA) ^{-1}AB \neq \mathbb{1}##, then this gives a rise to a new...
Hi
I just wanted to check my understanding of something which has come up when first studying path integrals in QM. If x and px are operators then [ x , px ] = iħ but if x and px operate on states to produce eigenvalues then the eigenvalues x and px commute because they are just numbers. Is...
Commutators always generate unwanted sparks and bad EM interference.
If slip ring can replace commutator in DC motor, then electric vehicle industry will love it more than multi-phase AC induction motor.
I have approached this question step by step as shown in the image attached.
I request someone to please guide if I have approached the (incomplete) solution correctly and also guide towards the complete solution, by helping me to rectify any mistakes I may have made.
I'm still unsure how to...
I would like to ask whether if operators ##A## and ##B## commute also operators ##e^A## and ##e^B## commute? Also I have a question is it possible that
##e^A## is matrix where all elements are ##\infty## so that ##e^A \cdot e^B-e^B\cdot e^A## has all elements that are ##\infty##?
I found a theorem that states that if A and B are 2 endomorphism that satisfies $$[A,[A,B]]=[B,[A,B]]=0$$ then $$[A,F(B)]=[A,B]F'(B)=[A,B]\frac{\partial F(B)}{\partial B}$$.
Now I'm trying to apply this result using the creation and annihilation fermionics operators $$B=C_k^+$$ and $$A=C_k$$...
$$<p_1 p_2|p_A p_B> = \sqrt{2E_1 2E_2 2E_A 2E_B}<0|a_1 a_2 a_{A}^{\dagger} a_{B}^{\dagger} |0>$$ $$=2E_A2E_B(2\pi)^6(\delta^{(3)}(p_A-p_1)\delta{(3)}(p_B-p_2) + \delta^{(3)}(p_A-p_2)\delta^{(3)}(p_B-p_1))$$
The identity above seemed easy, until I tried to prove it. I figured I could work this...
Hello guys, I have a question regarding commutators of vector fields and its pushforwards.
Let me define a clockwise rotation in the plane \,\phi:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^2 \,.\; [\,\partial_x\,,\,\partial_y\,]=0 \,, \;(\phi_{*}\partial_x) = \partial_r and \,(\phi_{*}\partial_y) =...
Homework Statement
Consider two operators A and B, such that [A,[A, B]] = 0 and [B,[A, B]] = 0 . Show that
Exp(A+B) = Exp(A)Exp(B)Exp(-1/2 [A,B])
Hint: define Exp(As)Exp(Bs) as T(s), where s is a real parameter, differentiate T(s) with respect to s, and express the result in terms of T(s)...
Homework Statement
After proving the relations ##[\hat{b}^{\dagger}_i,\hat{b}^{\dagger}_j]=0## and ##[\hat{b}_i,\hat{b}_j]=0##, I want to prove that ##[\hat{b}_j,\hat{b}^{\dagger}_k]=\delta_{jk}##, however I'm not sure where to begin.
2. The attempt at a solution
I tried to apply the...
This is a refinement of a previous thread (here). I hope I am following correct protocol.
Homework Statement
I am studying Spacetime and Geometry : An Introduction to General Relativity by Sean M Carroll and have a question about commutators of vector fields. A vector field on a manifold can...
Homework Statement
I am studying Spacetime and Geometry : An Introduction to General Relativity by Sean M Carroll and have a question about commutators of vector fields. A vector field on a manifold can be thought of as differential operator which transforms smooth functions to smooth functions...
...to give a number?
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-04-quantum-physics-i-spring-2016/lecture-notes/MIT8_04S16_LecNotes5.pdf
On page 6, it says,
"
Matrix mechanics, was worked out in 1925 by Werner Heisenberg and clarified by Max Born and Pascual Jordan. Note that, if we were to write xˆ...
Homework Statement
[/B]
Question:
(With the following definitions here: )
- Consider ##L_0|x>=0## to show that ##m^2=\frac{1}{\alpha'}##
- Consider ##L_1|x>=0 ## to conclude that ## 1+A-2B=0##
- where ##d## is the dimension of the space ##d=\eta^{uv}\eta_{uv}##
For the L1 operator I am...
I understand there exists some way of teaching QM via postulating commutation relation between coordinate and momentum operator. May be even not simply postulating but bringing some reasons why such a commutator should be equal to "i"?
Could you recommend some good book or article which teaches...
Hi.
To show that [ L2 , L+ ] uses the following commutators [ L2 , Lx ] = 0 and [ L2 , Ly ] = 0 . But if [ L2 , Lx ] = 0 this shows that L2 and Lx have simultaneous eigenstates ; but then should L2 and Ly not commute ?
Thanks
Homework Statement
Find the resul of [Jx Jy , Jz] where J is the angular momentum operator.
Possible answers to this multiple chioce question are
A) 0
B) i ħ Jz
C) i ħ Jz Jx
D) i ħ Jx Jz
E) i ħ Jx Jy
Homework Equations
[AB,C]=A [B,C]+[A,B] B
[Ji , Jj]=i ħ εijk Jk where εijk is the Levi-Civita...
If ##A## and ##B## are two operators that commute (i.e. [##A##,##B##] = 0), does that indicate if ##A^m## and ## B^n## more generally commute where m and n are not necessarily non-negative integers?
Homework Statement
A and B commute with their commutator, C=[A,B]
Show that [A, F(B)] = [A, B]F'(B)
F(B) = ∑n=0∞fnBn
Homework Equations
[A,B] = AB - BA
[A,BC] = [A,B]C + B[A,C]The Attempt at a Solution
So all I can think to do is:
[A,Bn] = [A,BBn-1] = [A,B]Bn-1 + B[A,Bn-1]...
Homework Statement
Show that ##<L_x^2> = <L_y^2>## using the commutation relations. The system is in the eigenstate |l,m> of ##L^2## and ##L_z##.
Homework Equations
##[L_x, L_y] = i \hbar L_z##
##[L_y, L_z] = i \hbar L_x##
##[L_z, L_x] = i \hbar L_y##
##[L_x, L^2] = 0##
##[L_y, L^2] = 0##...
Hi everyone, I'm new to Physics Forums and to Mathematica, as well as Jacobi Identity.
In any case, I was wondering on how I may use Mathematica to solve various Quantum Mechanics related problems through commutators. Like if it's possible to find out what is the form of a particular commutator...
I'm not perfectly clear on the connection between Poisson brackets in classical mechanics and commutators in quantum mechanics.
For any classical mechanical system, if I can find the Poisson bracket between two physical observables, is that always the value of the corresponding commutator in the...
so I have an expression here:
[P,g(r)]= -ih dg/dr
P is the momentum operator working on a function g(r).
Is this true because when you expand the left hand side the expression g(r)P is zero because the del operator has nothing to work on?
Homework Statement
The problem statement can be seen in the picture i uploaded.
Homework Equations
-
The Attempt at a Solution
The attempt to the solution can be seen in the picture i uploaded.
I reached to the A and i don't know how to proceed to the solution that is given below. How does...
just finished Susskind's QM. Definitely blew my mind. Can't stop wondering about commutators. Trying synthesize and remember with self quiz I can't self grade.
Super quiz: Could one in principle calculate the number of Planck flops (commutaor operations or bits) in a human lifetime?
My...
Homework Statement
Suppose A^ and B^ are linear quantum operators representing two observables A and B of a physical system. What must be true of the commutator [A^,B^] so that the system can have definite values of A and B simultaneously?
Homework Equations
I will use the bra-ket notation for...
I read the following as a model solution to a question but I don't understand it - " there is no possible finite dimensional representation of the operators x and p that can reproduce the commutator [x,p] = I(hbar)(identity matrix) since the LHS has zero trace and the RHS has finite trace. My...
Homework Statement
Prove that
## [L_a,L_b] = i \hbar \epsilon_{abc} L_c ##
using Einstein summation convention.
I think I have achieved the solution but I am not sure of my last steps, since this is one of my first excersises using this convention.
Homework Equations
[/B]
## (1)...
Homework Statement
Let e and f be unit vectors. Le = eL is the definition of the component of angular momentum in direction e. Calculate the commutator [Le,Lf ] in terms of e, f and L
Homework Equations
[A,B]=(AB-BA)
The Attempt at a Solution
we know that L=r x p, in classical mechanics, and...
Homework Statement
In the absence of degeneracy, prove that a sufficient condition for the equation below (1), where \left|a'\right> is an eigenket of A, et al., is (2) or (3).
Homework Equations
\sum_{b'} \left<c'|b'\right>\left<b'|a'\right>\left<a'|b'\right>\left<b'|c'\right> = \sum_{b',b''}...
Hi all,
My motivation is understanding some derivations in Quantum Mechanics, but I think my questions are purely algebraic. I have a general question and then a specific one:
General Question - when writing the commutator of commuting vector and a scalar operators (for instance angular...
I have two quick questions:
1. Why if say [x,y] = 0, it implies that there is a mutual complete set of eigenkets?
where x and y can be anything, like momentum, position operators.
2. If an operator is not hermitian, why isn't it an observable? (More specifically, why isn't its...
The commutator of two operators A and B, which measures the degree of incompatibility between A and B, is AB - BA (at least according to one textbook I have). But multiplying/substracting matrices just yields matrices! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_multiplication).
So firstly, how can a...
Homework Statement
Express the product
where σy and σz are the other two Pauli matrices defined above.
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
I'm not sure if this is a trick question, because right away both exponentials combine to give 1, where the result is...
Homework Statement
Let ## \hat{A} = x ## and ## \hat{B} = \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x} ## be operators
Let ## \hat{C} ## be defined ## \hat{C} = c ## with c some complex number.
A commutator of two operators ## \hat{A} ## and ## \hat{B} ## is written ## [ \hat{A}, \hat{B} ] ## and is...
Homework Statement
Hello:) My problem is as follows:
Determine the following commutators: [px2,x],[pxx2],[px2,x2],[]. The calculation can be done in two ways, either by inserting a test function, and using the explicit expressions for the operators, or by utilizing Jacobi identity and using...
Homework Statement
For the linear momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{p}}## and angular momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{L}} ##, prove that ##\begin{eqnarray}
[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]&=&0\end{eqnarray}##:
[Hint: Write ##\hat{\mathbf{L}}## as the ##x##-component of the angular...
I'm having a lot of trouble following Griffith's quantum mechanics text. I'm in section 4.3 which discusses angular momentum using commutators. The text proceeds as follows:
[L_x, L_y] = [yp_z - zp_y, zp_x - xp_z]\\
=[yp_z, zp_x] - [yp_z, xp_z] - [zp_y, zp_x] + [zp_y, xp_z]\\
=[yp_z, zp_x] +...
It seems the uncertainty principle, the commutator between operators, and the symmetry of the action integral are all related. And I wonder how universal this is.
For example, the action integral is invariant with respect to time, and this leads to conserved quantity of energy. This means...
Homework Statement
Consider the operator A and its Hermitian adjoint A*.
If [A,A*] = 1, evaluate: [A*A,A]
Homework Equations
standard rules of linear algebra, operator algebra and quantum mechanics
The Attempt at a Solution
[A,A*] = AA* - A*A = 1
A*A = (1+AA*)
[A*A,A] =...
Do the Fourier coefficients of an interacting field obey the commutation relations? I think I was able to show once that they do if the Fourier coefficients are taken at equal times (the coefficients are time-dependent in the interacting theory), but my proof felt shaky.
In any case, does...
Hi all,
Reading through Peskin and Schroeder, I came across the following statement, with regards to propagators:
Could someone explain how the commutator is related to the measurement of the field in this context? Searching online, the only thing that crops up is the usual uncertainty...
Homework Statement
Here's a link to an image of the exam question. It appears in the exam every couple of years, and it's due in my exam this coming week. I've looked in both the textbook and the course notes, and they simply *state* the conclusion, so I don't have a way of proving it, and...
Homework Statement
show that [x,f(p_x)] = i \hbar d/d(p_x) f(p_x)
Homework Equations
x is the position operator in the x direction, p_x is the momentum operator; i \hbar
d/dx
[x, p_x]=xp-px
The Attempt at a Solution
I'm stuck. maybe chain rule for d/dx and d/d(p_x)...? But I...
The letters next to p and L should be subscripts.
[Lz, px] = [xpy − ypx, px] = [xpy, px] − [ypx, px] = py[x, px] −0 = i(hbar)py
1.In this calculation, why is [x, px] not 0 even they commute?
2.Why is py put on the left instead of the right in the second last step? i thought it should be...
Hi you guys!
I am having a hard time understanding some stuff in this context.
I was not able to find any guidance in books or anything.
say I want to calculate:
[W^2,p^\alpha]=0, W=\frac{m}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\varepsilon}M_{\mu\lambda}p_\delta
How do I do that? I can't...
Symmetry, Groups, Algebras, Commutators, Conserved Quantities
OK, maybe this is asking too much, hopefully not.
I'm trying to understand the connection between all of these constructions. I wonder if a summary about these interrelationship can be given.
If I understand what I'm reading, there...