Euclidean geometry is a mathematical system attributed to Alexandrian Greek mathematician Euclid, which he described in his textbook on geometry: the Elements. Euclid's method consists in assuming a small set of intuitively appealing axioms, and deducing many other propositions (theorems) from these. Although many of Euclid's results had been stated by earlier mathematicians, Euclid was the first to show how these propositions could fit into a comprehensive deductive and logical system. The Elements begins with plane geometry, still taught in secondary school (high school) as the first axiomatic system and the first examples of mathematical proofs. It goes on to the solid geometry of three dimensions. Much of the Elements states results of what are now called algebra and number theory, explained in geometrical language.For more than two thousand years, the adjective "Euclidean" was unnecessary because no other sort of geometry had been conceived. Euclid's axioms seemed so intuitively obvious (with the possible exception of the parallel postulate) that any theorem proved from them was deemed true in an absolute, often metaphysical, sense. Today, however, many other self-consistent non-Euclidean geometries are known, the first ones having been discovered in the early 19th century. An implication of Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity is that physical space itself is not Euclidean, and Euclidean space is a good approximation for it only over short distances (relative to the strength of the gravitational field).Euclidean geometry is an example of synthetic geometry, in that it proceeds logically from axioms describing basic properties of geometric objects such as points and lines, to propositions about those objects, all without the use of coordinates to specify those objects. This is in contrast to analytic geometry, which uses coordinates to translate geometric propositions into algebraic formulas.
Euclid defines equivalent ratios as the following : "Magnitudes are said to be in the same ratio, the first to the second and the third to the fourth, when, if any equimultiples whatever be taken of the first and third, and any equimultiples whatever of the second and fourth, the former...
Consider ##\mathbb R^2## as the Euclidean plane. Since it is maximally symmetric it has a 3-parameter group of Killing vector fields (KVFs).
Pick orthogonal cartesian coordinates centered at point P. Then the 3 KVFs are given by: $$K_1=\partial_x, K_2=\partial_y, K_3=-y\partial_x + x...
When scientists measured the position of Mercury in the 18th century, they interpreted the results assuming a Euclidean background, because they did not know general relativity. So they measured r and φ in fuction of time attributing to these coordinates an Euclidean meaning, that is, assuming...
As a biochemist, I deal with chirality of molecules all the time. If you have a tetrahedral molecule, for example a carbon atom, and all 4 vertices are labeled differently, as in different atoms on each one, then that molecule has a mirror-symmetric one that cannot be superimposed on the...
So I've got the following problem:
I have points A, B, and C which form a triangle in a 3D space (each point of the triangle has x,y, and z coordinates). I need to find out on which side of the triangle point D lies. I do not have access to the normal of the triangle.
How am I supposed to...
(a) Let be m a line and the only two semiplans determined by m.
(i) Show that: If are points that do not belong to such , so and are in opposite sides of m.
(ii) In the same conditions of the last item, show: and .
(iii) Determine the union result , carefully justifying your answer...
In Anthony French's book, Newtonian Mechanics, while explaining the non-Euclidean nature of the 3-d space, he poses a problem (I have rephrased it slightly):
Suppose you are on Earth's equator (r = 6,400 km) at the prime meridian (point I).
You first walk along the equator 1000 miles east and...
Hi guys,
Hopefully, no geometry-enthusiasts are going to read these next few lines, but if that's the case, be lenient :)
I have always hated high-school geometry, those basic boring theorems about triangles, polygons, circles, and so on, and I have always "skipped" such classes, studying...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatness_problem
The flatness problem (also known as the oldness problem) is a cosmological fine-tuning problem within the Big Bang model of the universe.
The fine-tuning problem of the last century was solved by introducing the theory of inflation which flattens...
Hello all, I need some help on two exercises from Kiselev's geometry, about straight lines.
Ex 7: Use a straightedge to draw a line passing through two points given on a sheet of paper. Figure out how to check that the line is really straight. Hint: Flip the straightedge upside down.
I would...
Is there any theory in physics that can be modeled in any type of space (Hilbert space, Euclidean, Non-Euclidean...etc)? And if yes, could that theory also contain/be compatible with all types of (physical) symmetries?
Hi,
reading this link galilean spacetime a doubt raised to me: which is the difference (if any) between ##\mathbf E^1\times\mathbf E^3## and ##\mathbf E^4## ?
I believe each space there (spaces involved in the cartesian product too) has to be regarded as equipped with standard Euclidean structure
I am really confused about coordinate transformations right now, specifically, from cartesian to polar coordinates.
A vector in cartesian coordinates is given by ##x=x^i \partial_i## with ##\partial_x, \partial_y \in T_p \mathcal{M}## of some manifold ##\mathcal{M}## and and ##x^i## being some...
I've been trying to wrap my head around equidistant points, like platonic solid vertices inside a sphere where the points touch the sphere surface. This led me to the strange and unusual world of mathematical degeneracy, henagons, dihedrons, and so on, along with the lingering question of...
I'm wondering what could happen if we remove one axiom from Euclidean geometry. What are the conseqences? For example - how would space without postulate "To describe a cicle with any centre and distance" look like?
Why can't we prove euclids fifth postulate
What's wrong in this proof:
why can't we prove that there is only one line which passes through a single point which is parallel to a line.
If we can prove that two lines are parallel by proving that the alternate angles of a transverse passing...
So I was reading this book, "Euclidean and non Euclidean geometries" by Greenberg
I solved the first problems of the first chapter, and I would like to verify my solutions
1. Homework Statement
Homework Equations
[/B]
Um, none that I can think of?
The Attempt at a Solution
(1) Correct...
micromass submitted a new PF Insights post
In High School and Want to Do Advanced Mathematics?
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/high school-math.png
Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
Reading a somewhat long and argumentative thread here inspired the following unrelated question in my mind:
Where does a 2 dimensional flat Lorentzian geometry depart from Euclidean geometry as axiomatized by Euclid? I.e. Euclid's axioms (in modern language) can be taken to be:
We can...
I'm seeing a presentation of Euclidean geometry that isn't hand-holdy. I've looked at some textbooks used in high schools these days, and it's hard to find the axioms and theorems in the midst of all the condescension. I just want something that states the definitions, axioms and basic...
Hello,
I am totally bad at geometry , by geometry I mean plane euclidean geometry with similarities and circles. I sometimes feel totally lost with problems. For example:
The parallel sides of trapezoid ABCD are 3 cm and 9 cm(AB and DC).The non parallel sides are 4 cm and 6 cm(AD and BC).A...
Homework Statement
Two lines passing through a point Μ are tangent to a circle at the points A and B. Through a point С taken on the smaller of the arcs AB, a third tangent is drawn up to its intersection points D and Ε with MA and MB respectively. Prove that (1) the perimeter of ▲DME, and (2)...
"Then, since on the circumference of each of the circles ABDC and ACK two points A and C have been taken at random, the straight line joining the points falls within each circle, but it fell within the circle ABCD and outside ACK, which is absurd. Therefore a circle does not touch a circle...
If we choose rational numbers to represent points on a line then there will be gaps on the line and consequently the plane will be full of holes. Then we cannot say that two non-parallel line must intersect on a point (because they may meet at the gaps). So obviously we need point arranged more...
Think for example of the torus as a square with the proper edges identified. Viewed like this (i.e. using the flat metric), it clearly has zero curvature everywhere. More specifically, it seems Euclid's axioms are satisfied. But however we have non-trivial topology. So what's up?
Or is...
Homework Statement
LPN is a tangent to circle ADP. Circle BCP touches the larger circle internally at P. Chord AD cuts the smaller circle at B and C and BP and CP are joined
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
∠P4+5 = ∠B1 (tan chord theorem)
∠P1+2 = C1 (tan chord theorem)
Prove that in any triangle, if the angle bisectors of two angles are congruent, then the triangle is isosceles
Before I give my proof, here is a lemma to it:
If a pair of vertical angles both have angle bisectors, then all resulting angles are congruent.
Given: Vertical Angles ∠2 and ∠4, and...
Hello everybody,
Based of some information that I recently learnt(which I don't know if they are right or wrong), I start asking myself this question about the euclidean geometry.
Ok, this geometry is basically founded on straight lines, and what I have learned is there is no such a thing as a...
Hi, I'm a Physics undergraduate, and this semester I have the option to choose between Geometry (Axiomatic Euclidean Geometry) and other disciplines. In the next year I want to be ready to study Differential Geometry, but I don't know if I need to study Euclidean Geometry first. The teacher of...
Here is a spreadsheet I made to solve projectile motion problems. It uses only euclidean geometry to solve for the answers, but it gives the answers as slopes, not angles. All variables entered also must be in slopes and not angles. I added a section that does the conversion between the two...
Can someone please describe to me how Euclidean Geometry is connected to the complex plane? Angles preservations, distance, Mobius Transformations, isometries, anything would be nice.
Also, how can hyperbolic geometry be described with complex numbers?
Homework Statement
Please see below...
Homework Equations
Please see below...
The Attempt at a Solution
Hi. This question is on geometry with circle and triangle. I am stuck only on 2 parts of the solution and not the whole solution...
Thank you...
As a newbie, I apologize if this topic has been discussed before.
It seems to me that one result of quantum physics is that Euclidean geometry is artificial and cannot be represented in real space. For example, there can be no such thing as a straight line in granular quantum space.
And...
1. Maths project to investigate compass and straightedge constructions
2. Most of the project is fine, but i need to find out the mimimum number of constructions to bisect an angle, a line segment, etc.
3. I can prove that you can bisect an angle, and it requires 4 steps to do it...
I would like to know the basic experimental observations or the logic which prove that the 3-d space which we inhabit is a close approximation of Euclidean Geometry. is it because parallel lines don't appear to converge or diverge? But how is this established, as we can't draw perfect straight...
i really need help with this proof.
suppose two circles intersect at points P and Q. Prove that the line containing the centers of the circles is perpendicular to line segment PQ
Considering that space is not curved or warped (as some pop books will falsely lead you to believe) why is that Euclidean Geometry is not true in the real world?
I mean light bends in space because it falls in a gravitational field like everything else (because it has energy which is...
"For example, Euclidean geometry without the parallel postulate is incomplete; it is not possible to prove or disprove the parallel postulate from the remaining axioms."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems
The parallel postulate says that, if a line segment...
I have this question:
Inside a square ABDE, take a point C so that CDE is an isosceles triangle with angles 15 degrees at D and E. What kind of triangle is ABC?
I put C close to the bottom to get my isosceles triangle. According to the answer in back, the triangle ABC is equilateral...
I would say by now, I'm an expert in manipulating equations and playing with algebra. However, I've also realized I have no idea why some of the operations I do are valid. For example... why is (x+2)(x-2) = x^2 - 4? Why does this expansion work? I'm guessing it preserves some kind of field...
I am teaching euclidean geometry this fall and realized i don't know it that well. there are some famous modern versions of the axioms which do not completely satisfy me, such as hilberts, gasp. i said it.
i especially like the new book by hartshorne, geometry euclid and beyond, because he...
I wanted to know if euclidean geometry is to do with the real world ?
generalisations of vector space to anything that satisfies the axioms for a vector space can be made, but how can geometry be studied without reference to the real world ?
roger
"Surface Volume" in 4-d graph: Euclidean Geometry Question
Suppose you have a smooth parametrically defined volume V givin by the following equation.
f(x,y,z,w)= r(u,s,v) = x(u,v,s)i + y(u,v,s)j +z(u,v,s)k + w(u,v,s)l
Consider the vectors ru=dr/du, where dr/du is the partial...
Suppose you have a smooth parametrically defined volume V givin by the following equation.
f(x,y,z,w)= r(u,s,v) = x(u,v,s)i + y(u,v,s)j +z(u,v,s)k + w(u,v,s)l
Consider the vectors ru=dr/du, where dr/du is the partial derivitive of r with respect to the parameter u. Similarly, rv =...
If you had line AB is parallel to BC and BC is parallel to CD, is AB parallel to CD?
----> Not if AB=CD since a line (at least in Euclidean Geometry) cannot be parallel to itself.
How would you prove that AB is not line CD?
PLEASE NOTE: Base all your input in the realm of Euclidean...
Hi everyone, i have to do a general math project for my math course. It is nothng special, just a proof of a theorem on my choice and a bit of history and interesting facts. I kind of decided to do it on non-euclidean geometry, because it is fun. Now my question: does anybody know a good...
I was at brunch this morning and I met a young man of about 35 years who is a musician but studied mathematics in college. He mentioned to me that one of the great problems of mathematics is the problem of trisecting the angle. He taught me how to bisect an angle, and kept emphasizing that...