The MAJORANA project (styled Majorana) is an international effort to search for neutrinoless double-beta (0νββ) decay in 76Ge. The project builds upon the work of previous experiments, notably those performed by the Heidelberg–Moscow and IGEX collaborations, which used high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors, to study neutrinoless double-beta decay.The first stage of the project is the Majorana Demonstrator, designed to demonstrate the technique and evaluate a ton-scale experiment.
Cryostats housing up to 40 kg of natural and enriched germanium detectors are being deployed in low-background vacuum cryostats, underground (1,480 m) at the Sanford Underground Laboratory in Lead, South Dakota. Following the Demonstrator, the collaboration intends to merge with the GERDA collaboration to build a much larger experiment called LEGEND.
In books I find that the Majorana mass term for the neutrinos is given by m_L \nu_L^T C^\dagger \nu where C is Dirac Conjugation operator. How does C look like if I write \nu_L as in terms of its two components \left(\begin{array} (\nu_{L1} \\ \nu_{L2} \end{array} \right)?
Is C=...
I have a two component Weyl spinor transforming as \psi \rightarrow M \psi where M is an SL(2) matrix which represents a Lorentz transformation. Suppose another spinor \chi also transforms the same way \chi \rightarrow M \chi. I can write a Lorentz invariant term \psi^T (-i\sigma^2) \chi where...
I wasn't quite sure which forum to use for this, as it covers QM, relativity and geometric algebra, but I'm trying QM for a start.
The Dirac equation can be expressed surprisingly simply in the Algebra of Physical Space, as has been shown by W Baylis, and I worked the same thing out...
Hi,
one labels the Weyl- and Vector-representations of the Poincare group by (0,1/2), (1/2,0), (1/2,1/2) etc., where does the Majorana spinor fit into this?
Or can you say it belongs somehow to the real part of the (0,1/2)+(1/2,0) rep, although this sounds pretty unfamiliar.
Thanks for...
It is well known that at times we do need explicit representations for the Dirac gamma matrices while doing calculations with fermions. Recently I found two different expressions for Majorana representation for the gamma matrices. In one paper, the form used is:
\gamma_{0} = \left(...
[Moderator's note: Quoted-printable stuff NOT corrected. Sometimes I
correct small errors, but a) there are several here and b) it is not
obvious what the meaning should be. Please submit only 100% 7-bit ASCII
plain-text posts. Even if YOU can read something fancier, many readers
can't...
The electromagnetic current vanishes identically in the Majorana case: http://users.jyu.fi/~hetahein/tiede/virta.pdf" .
In the case someone cannot open the pdf, here is the formula:
\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi = \overline{\psi^{C}}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{C} =...
A question concerning Feynman rules for Dirac vs Majorana neutrinos.
Take e.g. the scattering process:
electron + positron -> electron neutrino + electron antineutrino.
Following the electroweak Feynman rules we can calculate an expression for the unpolarized differential cross section...
For my diploma thesis I must provide a calculation that reproduces the
results given on page 46 of the paper hep-ph/0309342 . For those who do
not want to look it up, I briefly explain what it is about: It concerns
the two-body scattering processes
(1) N + V => L + H,
(2) N + L => V + H,
(3) N...
People say that if neutrinos are Majorana particles, they are "identical to their anti particle". But anti neutrinos are obviously different from neutrinos. They produce anti-leptons rather than leptons in the scattering process. So the only difference I can image is the helicity, however that...