Is it true that in any mechanical set-up, it is possible to predict the nature of Normal Reaction ( magnitude, direction, etc. ) without solving through the dynamical equations of motion and constraints for the set-up as Normal Reaction is completely unknown? I mean is it true that we can...
Hello shipmates,
Instead of imagining a Dirac Delta as the limit of a normal, like this:
$$ \delta\left ( x \right ) = \lim_{a \to 0}\frac{1}{|a|\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp\left [ -\left ( x/a \right )^2 \right ] $$
Could we say the same thing except starting with a lognormal, like this?
$$ \delta_{LN}...
If ##p## is a prime, and ##G## is a finite non-cyclic ##p##-group, show that there is a normal subgroup ##N## of ##G## such that ##G/N## is isomorphic to ##\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}##.
Hello, I was recently tested on finding the normal force at the base of a ladder leaning against a wall as well as its friction force. So this is the question from memory.
Given:
θ the acute angle between the ground and the ladder
μ as the coefficient of friction between the ground and the...
I'm not sure this is a differential geometry question, but I think it is.
In general when we have a hypersurface(or in case of 3D space just a surface) it is defined with an equation ##f(x^a)=0## for some function ##f##. Then the normal vector is the gradient of this function, if we want an...
For this,
Does someone please know how setting ##P_1## and ##P_2## true makes the CNF true? If I see ##P_2## true, then it ##(true + false)## since it is negated. Therefore, should they be setting ##P_1## true and ##P_2## false?
Many thanks!
In another thread
This has me curious about "ordering other than our normal ordering." What does this mean? I take it that "normal ordering (of integers)" is ... 0, 1, 2, 3... Do mathematicians consider alternate orderings like ...0, 2, 1, 3... That doesnt seem to make sense to me, that's...
This question states that the normal force of the stairs on the woman does NO work. I do not understand how this can be. I would reason like this:
The woman propels herself up the stairs using her legs. Her legs push down against the stairs, and the consequent normal force pushes upwards on her...
This exercise comes from Kleppner and Kolenkow, 2nd ed., problem 6-3. I'm using a solution key as a study reference, but the solution key is coming to a pretty different conclusion. Mostly the issue is in the equations of motion for this system. I'm not sure if there's something I'm...
As you can see in this picture: This explanation "relation between the normal and the slope of a curve" is formulated here:
$$\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{d\rho }{d\psi }=\tan\left(\frac{\theta+\psi}{2}\right)$$
I got confused because I don't have the curve equation(regarding the slope of the curve...
Here is my combined loading:
The book solution for normal and shear stresses respectively are:
a) ##20.4~\text{MPa}, 14.34 ~\text{MPa} ## - I find both
b) ##-21.5~\text{MPa}, \boxed{19.98~\text{MPa}}## - I find the normal stress, but I'm not getting the book answer for the shear stress...
What is the acceleration of the box? Paper says the answer is 4 m/s2.
What is the Normal force acting on the box? Paper says the answer is 418 N.
I know that for most cases FN=Fg=W. So, by definition the "original" Normal force is 245.25 N (am I correct?)
I calculated the Fay which is...
neglect friction and motion (sliding) and G(sphere)=20N. In this question I reached two different result with two different solving method.But one of them is false according to answer key. My question is why first solving way is false? Because the first solution way makes sense to me. If we...
Under certain conditions, a supersonic flow in a nozzle will result in a "normal shock", an abrupt change in pressure and velocity. In the videos I've looked at, they draw the P and v graphs with a vertical step at that point.
But in practice, I assume there will be a non-zero transition zone...
An interesting paper in NATURE "A superconductor free of quasiparticles for seconds"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-021-01433-7
showing that superconducting (paired) electrons don't hop into normal states for seconds. The measurement device detects single pair-breaking-events for a large...
so this is what the FBD is.... but to be fair, to me this one looks as if the normal force in the direction of the radial line, yet it isn't????
here in the solution, it's not along the radial line, whys that???
so I was wondering. there is this normal force on the can from the path. And there's this formula to find the angle between the radial line and the tangent or also between the normal force and either the radial or theta axis. the formula is ##\psi = r/dr/d\theta##. The thing is that here they...
... after many failed attempts at figuring it out? Is it normal for him to soon after declare himself done trying to figure out the solution and the language, only to return to it after only a short period of distancing himself from it by a short walk or some number of hours goofing off? Is it...
Dear all,
Me and some colleagues (non-physicists) are discussing how force works when passing a cylinder (which we are holding) into a narrow tube. As we insert more of the cylinder into the tube, the force we are exerting is increasing. My theory is that the normal force is increasing and his...
The problem that I immediately ran into was how I would calculate N without knowing Fmax. I didn't think the y-component of N would simply be the same magnitude as mg. After being stuck for a good while I even tested if it was, by dividing the magnitude of mg with cosθ, which of course ended up...
From the equation for centripetal force, I can see that the centripetal force is proportional to v^2. Does this have something to do with why there is a normal force at the top? Does the velocity of the object require there to be a normal force? If so, why is that the case?
The following is given:
$$\displaystyle P(K = k) = \frac{1}{2}~\frac{\sqrt{2}~e^{-\frac{1}{2}~\frac{\left(k -\mu \right)^{2}}{\sigma ^{2}}}}{\sigma ~\sqrt{\pi }}$$
How can you prove that the following equalities are correct?
$$\displaystyle \sum _{k=-\infty }^{\infty }1/2\,{\frac {...
Hello,
When we consider a block sitting on a surface, the gravitational force ##W## and the normal force ##F_N## are applied to the block. Both equal i magnitude and opposite in direction. We call the normal force the reaction force exerted by the surface on the block.
Now we consider the...
In the article A Discrete Normal Distribution of Dilip Roy in the journal COMMUNICATION IN STATISTICS Theory and methods Vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1871-1883, 2003 one can read:
A discrete normal (##dNormal##) variate, ##dX##, can be viewed as the
discrete concentration of the normal variate ##X##...
I'm trying to solve an improper integral, but I'm not familiar with this kind of integral.
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} (xa^3 e^{-x^2} + ab e^{-x^2}) dx##
a and b are both constants.
From what I found
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d e^{-u^2} dx = \sqrt{\pi}##, where d is a constant
and...
I have seen a few posts on this subject before, but none have really answered my question. For clarity, I will refer to the 1st example as a wedge, and the second as a ramp (although both are of course inclined planes). With both examples that I outline below, we will assume no friction, and a...
Yes, I should hit the books more, so forgive the basic question. I take it normality is known by observing unsplit photon spin ? But how can one then exclude that split photons in themselves might have different probability outcomes ? Thx much in advance. (Please pardon that only...
I do understand that gravitational the electromagnetic force between two electrons or protons is very large compared to the gravitational force between them. I can see this by looking at the equation of gravitational force (##F= \frac {Gm_1m_2} {r^2}##) and the equation of electrical force given...
My attempt/questions:
I use ##T^{0i} = \dot{\phi}\partial^i \phi##, ##\dot{\phi} = \pi##, and antisymmetry of ##Q_i## to get:
##Q_i = 2\epsilon_{ijk}\int d^3x [x^j \partial^k \phi(\vec{x})] \pi(\vec{x})##.
I then plug in the expansions for ##\phi(\vec{x})## and ##\pi(\vec{x})## and multiply...
It is crystal clear that we need torque equation to solve this. But, in order to do so, I need to know where the normal force is located. As far as I'm concerned, normal force is not distributed equally. If this is true, then I suppose this problem is unsolvable? (Though the book says thay it is...
If a Hookean spring-mass system is made from one mass and a spring, to produce a system with a particular oscillation frequency, it's not a problem to use the propagation of errors concept to find how this frequency responds to small errors in the mass and spring constant. If a chain of...
Good afternoon everyone,
I have a question on Newton's 2nd Law regarding objects on a generic incline. Take for example, a car on a banked curve:
Here in the picture I've provided, you can see that the normal force has been decomposed into the x and y components via sine and cosine of the...
I'm following 《A First Course In General Relativity》.On page 72,it says"If the surface is spacelike,the outward normal vector points outwards.If the surface is timelike,however,the outward normal vector points inwards"I wonder why and how?
My interest is on part (c),
My take,
##Z=\dfrac{160−200}{60}=−0.666666##
##Pr(−0.66666)=0.3546##
##⇒\dfrac{x_1-200}{60}=1.05##
##x_1=63+200=263##
Yes, i am aware that they want the answer to ##5## significant figures...i just wanted to check the alternative method...
Appreciate your insight...
I have the following function for the normal distribution:
$$\displaystyle f \left(x \right) = \frac{1}{2}~\frac{\sqrt{2}~e^{-\frac{1}{2}~\frac{\left(x -\mu \right)^{2}}{\sigma ^{2}}}}{\sigma ~\sqrt{\pi }}$$
How can the following integrals be equal to their sums?
$$\displaystyle \int_{-\infty...
I will only care about the ##t## and ##x## coordinates so that ##(t, z, x, x_i) \rightarrow (t,x)##.
The normal vector is given by,
##n^\mu = g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\nu S ##
How do I calculate ##n^\mu## in terms of ##U## given that the surface is written in terms of ##t## and ##x##?
Also, after...
I was doing the exercise as follows:
I am not sure if you agree with me, but i disagree with the solution given.
I was expecting that the kinect energy of the mass ##m## (##T_2##) should be $$T_2 = \frac{m((\dot q+lcos(\theta)\dot \theta)^2 + (lsin(\theta) \dot \theta)^2)}{2}$$
I could be...
Going through Axler's awful book on linear algebra. The complex spectral theorem (for operator T on vector space V) states that the following are equivalent: 1) T is normal 2) V has an orthonormal basis consisting of eigenvectors of T and 3) the matrix representation of T is diagonal with...
De normal distribution has the following form:
$$\displaystyle f \left(x \right) \, = \,\frac{1}{2}~\frac{\sqrt{2}~e^{-\frac{1}{2}~\frac{\left(x -\nu \right)^{2}}{\tau ^{2}}}}{\tau ~\sqrt{\pi }}$$
and it's integral is equal to one:
$$\displaystyle \int_{-\infty }^{\infty }\!1/2\,{\frac {...
The answer should be no change but we know ##F=ma##. In this eqn when acceleration increases mass decreases for same force. So why not here? If normal is doubled ##\mu## should be halved.
a. I solved a but I don't fully understand how it works.
$$z = f_x'(1, -1)(x -1) + f_y'(1, -1)(y+1) = 2(x-1) + 3(y+1)$$
Eitherway it's b that's my issue.
I can find the gradient of both plane and surface, but trying to do "dot-product of both normals = 1" will give an equation involving two...
It's a simple application of Newton's third law to show that the Earth indeed does accelerate towards an object as it falls towards earth.
M_o is the mass of the object
M_e is the mass of the earth
From the third law (and ignoring air drag):
M_e * a_e - M_o*g = 0 (with a up-positive...
First, I am trying to find the external reactions in A and B, but I have only one equation relating ##V_A## and ##V_B##, what other relation could I use ?
Once I find the reactions, I can find the external moment as well. Then, I may draw the diagram of moments in each cross section and then...
What is the meaning of this proof? What is the meaning of last statement of this proof? How to prove lemma (7.1)? or How to answer problem 1 given below?