In Coleman's QFT lectures, I'm confused by equation 7.57. To give the background, Coleman is trying to calculate the scattering matrix (S matrix) for a situation in which the Hamiltonian is given by
$$H=H_{0}+f\left(t,T,\Delta\right)H_{I}\left(t\right)$$
where ##H_{0}## is the free Hamiltonian...
Im following Weinberg's QFT volume I and I am tying to show that the following equation vanishes at large spatial distance of the possible particle clusters (pg 181 eq 4.3.8):
S_{x_1'x_2'... , x_1 x_2}^C = \int d^3p_1' d^3p_2'...d^3p_1d^3p_2...S_{p_1'p_2'... , p_1 p_2}^C \times e^{i p_1' ...
Here we consider a black hole formed by gravitational collapse classically. We also consider a scalar massless Klein-Gordon field propagating on this background.
To quantize the field we expand it in appropriate modes. The three sets of modes required are:
The incoming modes, appropriate for...
Hello! I attached a SS of the part of my book that I am confused about. So there they write the initial and final states in term of creation and annihilation operators, acting on the (not free) vacuum i.e. ##|\Omega>##. So first thing, the value of the creation (annihilation) operators at...
Hello! I am reading about the S matrix, and I see that one of the assumption that the derivations are based on is the fact that interacting particles are free at ##t=\pm \infty## and I am not sure I understand why. One of the given examples is the ##\phi^4## theory which contains an interaction...
Is A_pp(s,t)=A_pBARp(t,s) true based on crossing symmetry?
Consider pp and pBARp elastic colissions (p + p -> p + p and p + BAR(p) -> p + BAR(p)). The scattering amplitudes are related by crossing in the following way:
1) A_pp(s,t)=A_pBARp(u,t) \simeq A_pBARp(-s-t,t) (energy large compared to...
I am studying quantum field theory from [David Tong's lecture notes][1] and I am stuck at a particular place.
In Page 52., under the heading *3.1.1 Dyson's Formula*, Tong introduces an unitary operator
U(t, t_0) = T \exp(-i\int_{t_0}^{t}H_I(t') dt')
He then introduces the usual definition of...
I have a question regarding a derivation in Peskin and Schroeder's QFT book. On page 298, he is discussing a method for defining a gauge invariant S matrix. He does this by defining projection operators ##P_0## that project general particle states into gauge invariant states, and then defining...
Hi All,
The S-matrix is defined as the inner product of the in- and out-states, as in Eq. (3.2.1) in Weinberg's QFT vol 1:
S_{βα}=(Ψ−β,Ψ+α)
\Psi_{±α} are the eigenstates of the full Hamiltonian with a non-zero interaction term.
Can \alpha describes a neutron ? Since it is not stable, it is...
Hi,
Recently I was confronted with some difficulties in understanding the perturbative expansion of S matrix .
The conventional treatment is expansing it in the interaction picture,which have to first transform Lagrangian to Hamiltonian and then replace the original field operator by...
I have some questions regarding:
S = \sum_{n=0}^\infty\ S^n = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{i^n}{n!} \idotsint \ {d^4x_1}\ {d^4x_2}
\dots \ d^4x_n \ T (H_I(x_1) \ H_I(x_2) \dots \ H_I(x_n) )
1) What is n? How do you pick n given some interaction? ( I think it might be the order in...