MHB 1.6.365 AP Calculus Exam Limits

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
ok I chose c being false, since a limit does not exist if f(x) is different coming from $\pm$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to look at left-hand and right-hand limits. I don't see where "$\pm$" comes into it.
 
I believe that "from the left and from the right" was what Karush meant by "\pm!

Yes, Karush, "c" is the only one that is false.

a) \lim_{x\to 2} f(x) exists.
True. The limit is 2. (f(2)= 1 so f is NOT continuous there.)

b) \lim_{x\to 3} f(x) exists.
True. The limit is 5. (Further f(3)= 5 so f is continuous there.)

c) \lim_{x\to 4} f(x) exists.
False. The "limit from the left", \lim_{x\to 4^-} f(x), is 2 while the "limit from the right", \lim_{x\to 4^+} f(x), is 4. Since the two one-sided limits are not the same the limit itself does not exist.

d) \lim_{x\to 5} f(x) exists.
True. The limit is 6. (Further f(5)= 6 so f is continuous there.)

e) f is continuous at x= 3.
True. As I said in (b), \lim_{x\to 3} f(x) and f(3) both exist and are equal.
 
ok I think the big visual hint on this one was the obvious disconnected gap.

mahalo everyone the comments really increase the insight on these.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top