MHB 13.3.2 What is the 50th term of the sequence

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Term
AI Thread Summary
The 3rd and 4th terms of an arithmetic sequence are 13 and 18, indicating a common difference of 5. The general term of the sequence is derived as a_n = 3 + (n-1)5. Calculating the 50th term using this formula results in 248, not 250 as previously suggested. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the correct formula for the nth term in an arithmetic sequence. The correct answer for the 50th term is 248.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
The 3rd and 4th terms of an arithmetic sequence are 13 and 18. respectively.
What is the 50th term of the sequence!
a, 248 b. 250 c. 253 d, 258 e, 763

b the common difference is 5 so $5\cdot 50=\boxed{250}$

basically these are easy but I still seem to miss the goal posts
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, so d = 5. What is the first term in the series? What is the equation to get the nth term of the series?

-Dan
 
Since this has been here a while and, as topsquark implied, Karush's answer is wrong:
An "arithmetic sequence" has the form a, a+ r, a+ 2r, a+ 3r, a+ 4r ..., with "common difference" between two successive terms r. The general term is "a+ (n-1)r", NOT "nr".

Here two successive terms are 13 and 18 so the "common difference" is 18- 13= 5 as Karush said. But 13= 3+ 2(5) and 18= 3+ 3(5) so the general term is $a_n= 3+ (n-1)5$ and the 50th term is 3+ 49(5)= 248, not 250.
 
Mahalo
yeah that post kinda got left hanging
i never found these essy
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
13K
Back
Top